Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 21, 2025 | Supreme Court Sides With FDA on Flavored Vape Denials

Supreme Court Kicks Off Historic Agenda: Part III

The U.S. Supreme Court currently has 48 cases on its docket for the October 2012 Term. However, it is very likely that the term’s blockbuster cases have not yet been added to the docket. Voting rights and same-sex marriage are two clear examples.

At its October 26 Conference, the Court will consider several additional petitions for writ of certiorari. The legal term refers to the legal document filed with the Supreme Court seeking review of a decision of a lower court. When the Court agrees to hear a case, it grants a writ of certiorari.

Although most petitions are ultimately denied, the Court will likely grant review of several additional cases. Below are several petitions to watch:

Delling v. Idaho: The Court has been asked to consider whether the Fourteenth or Eighth Amendment mandates the availability of an insanity defense in criminal cases. The Court reserved the question in Clark v. Arizona, 548 U.S. 735, 752 n.20 (2006).

Nix v. Holder and Shelby County v. Holder: Both cases challenge Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which requires several states to obtain preclearance from the Department of Justice before making changes to their voting procedures. The specific question presented is whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize the provision exceeded its authority under the Fifteenth Amendment and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.

Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc.: The Court will be asked weigh in on whether disparate impact claims can be filed under the Fair Housing Act. If so, the question becomes how to determine whether a prima facie case of disparate impact has been made.

With respect to same-sex marriage, there are currently eight petitions pending with the Court. Seven of the cases involve the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), while the other challenges the constitutionality of California’s “Proposition 8,” which seeks to ban same-sex marriage in that state. The Supreme Court has not yet announced when it will consider the petitions, but they could be addressed in the November conferences.

Previous Articles

SCOTUS Agrees to Consider Birthright Citizen Cases
by DONALD SCARINCI on May 21, 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider legal challenges to President Donald Trump’s execut...

Read More
SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act
by DONALD SCARINCI on May 6, 2025

In Trump v. J.G.G., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that non-citizens challenging their removal under ...

Read More
Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising