Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 21, 2025 | Supreme Court Sides With FDA on Flavored Vape Denials

The Supreme Court’s Top Cases of 2012

From the Affordable Care Act to immigration, the U.S. Supreme Court tackled a number of high-profile issues in 2012. This post offers a look back at some of the most important cases of the past year and how they may change the legal landscape for many more to come.

Arizona v. United States: In a split-decision, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld parts of Arizona’s controversial immigration law, while striking down others. It held that federal law preempted Sections 3, 5(C), and 6 of Arizona’s immigration law. The invalidated provisions required legal immigrants to carry legal documentation at all times; authorized state law enforcement to arrest any individual under suspicion of being an illegal alien; and made it a misdemeanor for an illegal alien to search for or hold a job in Arizona. However, the Court left Section 2(B)—widely referred to as the “show me your papers” provision—intact. The decision is expected to inform future efforts to regulate immigration at the state level.

American Tradition Partnership v. Bullock: While it was only a per curium decision, the Supreme Court’s holding solidified that the justices still stood behind Citizen’s United. It further clarified that the Court’s approval of corporate political spending applies equally to both state and local elections.

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius: In the most-anticipated case of 2012, the Supreme Court upheld the individual mandate of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. While the majority of the Court agreed that the individual mandate was not a proper use of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause, they did find that it was valid under Congress’s taxing power. Although several other legal challenges are making their way through the federal courts, the landmark decision solidifies most provisions of the sweeping health care reform.

U.S. v. Jones: In one of the biggest criminal decision of the year, the Supreme Court held that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and then using the device to monitor its movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment. As such, law enforcement must obtain a warrant. The narrow opinion leaves many questions unanswered when it comes to our expectation of privacy and modern technology.

While the Supreme Court certainly made headlines in 2012, the upcoming year could be just as memorable. With decisions expected on controversial issues like same-sex marriage and affirmative action, the legacy of the Roberts court will continue to evolve.

Previous Articles

SCOTUS Agrees to Consider Birthright Citizen Cases
by DONALD SCARINCI on May 21, 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider legal challenges to President Donald Trump’s execut...

Read More
SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act
by DONALD SCARINCI on May 6, 2025

In Trump v. J.G.G., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that non-citizens challenging their removal under ...

Read More
Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising