Affirmative Action Decision Could Rest on Decades Old Busing Case: Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1
The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in one of its most controversial cases. In Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, the Court must decide the constitutionality of an amendment to the Michigan state constitution that bans the use of affirmative action in the college admissions process.
Ultimately, the decision could come down to how notorious swing voter Justice Anthony M. Kennedy views the existing precedent established in Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1, 458 U.S. 457 (1982). The case involved a voter initiative that banned mandatory busing, which the school district planned to use to achieve racial integration in public schools. While the Court’s liberal justices found the cases to be nearly identical, Justice Kennedy questioned whether there were both legal and factual differences.
The Facts of the Case
In 1978, the Seattle School District No. 1 (District) enacted the so-called Seattle Plan for desegregation of its schools, largely through mandatory busing. In response, voters passed a statewide initiative (Initiative 350), which prohibited school boards from requiring any student to attend a school other than the one geographically nearest or next nearest to his home, subject to a number of exceptions such as overcrowding, lack of necessary physical facilities, and the need for special educational programs. The district subsequently filed suit against the state challenging the constitutionality of Initiative 350 under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Court’s Decision
By a vote of five to four, the Court ultimately agreed that the voter initiative violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The majority specifically held that Initiative 350 was unconstitutional because it failed to allocate governmental power on the basis of any general principle, but rather used the “racial nature of an issue to define the governmental decisionmaking structure, thus imposing substantial and unique burdens on racial minorities.”
As explained by the Court, “Initiative 350 works something more than the ‘mere repeal’ of a desegregation law by the political entity that created it. It burdens all future attempts to integrate Washington schools by lodging decisionmaking authority over the question at a new and remote level of government. This makes the enactment of racially beneficial legislation uniquely difficult, and therefore imposes direct and undeniable burdens on minority interests.”
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ARTICLES
Lemon v Kurtzman Test for Establishment Clause Violationsby DONALD SCARINCI on November 14, 2017
In Lemon v Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971), the U.S. Supreme Court held that state statutes that provi...
Patchak v Zinke to Address Separation of Powersby DONALD SCARINCI on November 9, 2017
The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Patchak v Zinke. The case involves whether Congre...
Griggs v Duke Power Co & the 1964 Civil Rights Actby DONALD SCARINCI on November 7, 2017
In Griggs v Duke Power Co, 401 U.S. 424 (1971), the U.S. Supreme Court held that aptitude tests use...
- Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
- Freedom of Speech
- Freedoms of Press
- Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
- The Right to Bear Arms
- Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
- Due Process
- Eminent Domain
- Rights of Criminal Defendants
Preamble to the Bill of Rights
Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.
THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.