Can You Patent Software? Supreme Court Will Decide
On March 31, 2014, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments regarding whether computer-implemented inventions are patent eligible. The case, Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, centers on Section 101 of the Patent Act which provides that “[w]hoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.” It has been established that the creation cannot be an abstract idea or product of nature.
The district court held the computer program patents were an un-patentable abstract idea that failed to meet the requirements of §101, and thus were invalid. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rendered a widely split decision reversing the district court holding that the method claims were patent eligible. The en banc Federal Circuit found the tool at issue ineligible for a patent, but a standard for making such determinations could not be agreed upon.
Facts of the case
Alice is the owner of patents covering a computer-implemented method for reducing risk in financial transactions. Specifically, because transactions for the exchange of currency or financial goods are often delayed, the program develops a settlement arrangement to decide which party is obligated to deliver. The idea is to eliminate the risk of one party failing to perform after the other party has already performed.
CLS filed a declaratory judgment action against Alice alleging the patents are not valid under Section 101 because the program is an abstract idea. Alice responded with its own lawsuit, claiming infringement of its patent rights.
Will the Court define what constitutes an abstract idea?
The Federal Circuit was unable to agree on a standard for determining what constitutes an abstract idea as applied to an invention implemented by a computer. If the Supreme Court defines abstract idea as applied to intellectual property, it could significantly impact our country’s largest companies and even the economy. Patent-eligibility will directly affect product innovation, technology and patent practices.
Supreme Court Tackles Bridgegate Scandal and Four Other Casesby DONALD SCARINCI on January 21, 2020
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kelly v. United States, the criminal case...
Supreme Court Kicks Off Second Half of 2019-2020 Termby DONALD SCARINCI on January 16, 2020
The Supreme Court is back in session, with the justices returning from their winter break on Januar...
Separation of Powers Under Morrison v. Olsonby DONALD SCARINCI on January 14, 2020
In Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the independent counsel pr...
- Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
- Freedom of Speech
- Freedoms of Press
- Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
- The Right to Bear Arms
- Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
- Due Process
- Eminent Domain
- Rights of Criminal Defendants
Preamble to the Bill of Rights
Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.
THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.