Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

August 28, 2023 | Supreme Court Upholds Corporate Personal Jurisdiction Laws

Weston v City Council of Charleston: What Is a “Suit?”

Historical

In Weston v City Council of Charleston, 27 U.S. 449 (1829), the Supreme Court held that a city ordinance taxing interest-bearing stock of the United States was unconstitutional. The Court specifically found that the tax burdened the enumerated power of Congress “to borrow money on the credit of the United States.”

The Facts in Weston v City Council of Charleston

In 1823, the City Council of Charleston enacted an ordinance imposing a tax on six and seven percent stock of the United States. Several owners of United States stock filed suit against the City Council of Charleston, seeking to restrain them from levying the tax. They argued that a tax on the stock of the United States violated the U.S. Constitution. A South Carolina court held that the ordinance as not repugnant to the Constitution and the plaintiffs appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Court’s Decision in Weston v City Council of Charleston

The Supreme Court struck down the tax. “A tax imposed by a law of any state of the United States or under the authority of such a law on stock issued for loans made to the United States is unconstitutional,” the Court held.

Chief Justice John Marshall wrote on behalf of the Court. He explained:

It is not the want of original power in an independent sovereign state to prohibit loans to a foreign government which restrains the state legislature from direct opposition to those made by the United States. The restraint is imposed by our Constitution. The American people have conferred the power of borrowing money on the government, and by making that government supreme, have shielded its action in the exercise of that power, from the action of the local governments. The grant of the power and the declaration of supremacy is a declaration that no such distraining or controlling power shall be exercised.

In its decision, the Court also addressed the power of the Supreme Court to revise the judgments of state tribunals under the Judiciary Act. “The term ‘suit’ is certainly a very comprehensive one, and is understood to apply to any proceeding in a court of justice, by which an individual pursues that remedy in a court of justice, which the law affords him,” The Chief Justice explained. “[I]f a right is litigated between parties in a court of justice, the proceeding by which the decision of the court is sought, is a suit.”

Previous Articles

SCOTUS Clarifies Scienter Standard for False Claims Act Cases
by DONALD SCARINCI on September 19, 2023

In U.S. ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc., 598 U. S. ____ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that ...

Read More
Supreme Court Decides Key Elections Law Case
by DONALD SCARINCI on September 12, 2023

In Yegiazaryan v. Smagin,599 U.S. ____ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a plaintiff alleges...

Read More
Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Encouraging Illegal Immigration
by DONALD SCARINCI on September 8, 2023

In United States v. Hansen, 599 U.S. ____ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a federal law that...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court’s Landmark Affirmative Action Decision Strikes Down Raced-Based Admissions
  • SCOTUS Clarifies Scienter Standard for False Claims Act Cases
  • Supreme Court Decides Key Elections Law Case
  • Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Encouraging Illegal Immigration

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

con law awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising