Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
    • First Ladies
    • Signers of the U.S. Constitution
    • Signers of the Declaration of Independence
    • Delegates of the U.S. Constitution
    • Misc – Great American Bios
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

October 8, 2025 | Supreme Court Stays Order Blocking Roving Immigration Patrols in CA

Supreme Court Adds Gerrymandering Case to Docket

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider a closely watched Louisiana redistricting dispute involving a map that created a second majority-Black congressional district in the state. The two cases, Louisiana v. Callais and Robinson v. Callais, provide an opportunity for the justices to address the tension between the Voting Rights Act and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Facts of the Case

The cases spring from more than two years of litigation, in which two separate groups of voters have challenged Louisiana’s congressional maps. The first challenge alleged that the state’s map violated §2 of the Voting Rights Act, while the current suits contend that the map runs afoul of the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.

In the first round of redistricting litigation, Robinson, et al v. Ardoin, the district court concluded that theplaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that Louisiana’s 2022 redistricting plan violated the Voting Rights Act. The plaintiffs had alleged that the plan violated Section 2, which prohibits election practices that result in a denial or abridgement of the right to vote based on race, by diluting the votes of the state’s Black residents, which make up a third of the state’s population.

In response to the court’s decision, the Louisiana Legislature adopted a new redistricting map via by Senate Bill 8 (SB8), which established a second majority-Black congressional district to resolve theRobinsonlitigation. A separate group of plaintiffs then filed the latest case challenging the 2024 congressional map on the grounds that the second majority Black district created by the Legislature violates the Equal Protection Clause because it sorted voters predominantly by race.

Lower Court’s Decision

A majority of a three-judge court sitting in the Western District of Louisiana enjoined SB 8 as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. While the court acknowledge that race neutral considerations factored into the Legislature’s decisions, such as the protection of incumbent representatives, it ultimately determined that race was the predominate factor driving decisions made by the State in drawing the contours of District 6. In reaching its decision, the court emphasized that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act never requires race to predominate in drawing Congressional districts at the sacrifice of traditional districting principles.

In its appeal, the State of Louisiana contends that it is “stuck in an endless game of ping-pong” that must be resolved. If not, “the state will be sued again no matter what it does,” it argues.

Issues Before the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court granted certiorari on November 4, 2024. The justices have agreed to consider the following questions: (1) Whether the majority of the three-judge district court in this case erred in finding that race predominated in the Louisiana legislature’s enactment of S.B. 8; (2) whether the majority erred in finding that S.B. 8 fails strict scrutiny; (3) whether the majority erred in subjecting S.B. 8 to the preconditions specified inThornburg v. Gingles; and (4) whether this action is non-justiciable.

Oral arguments have not yet been scheduled, but will likely take place early next year. A decision is expected by the end of the term in June/July. Please check back for updates.

Previous Articles

SCOTUS Holds No Minimum Contacts Required for Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign States Under FSIA
by DONALD SCARINCI on October 2, 2025

In CC/Devas (Mauritius) Limited v. Antrix Corp. Ltd., 605 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court ...

Read More
SCOTUS Sides With Trump Administration Over NIH Grants Tied to DEI Initiatives
by DONALD SCARINCI on September 26, 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court continues to issue emergency orders involving legal challenges to policy cha...

Read More
SCOTUS Rejects Challenge to South Carolina’s Exclusion of Planned Parenthood from State Medicaid Program
by DONALD SCARINCI on September 16, 2025

In Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, 606 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held t...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of First Step Act to Vacated Sentences
  • SCOTUS Rules E-Cigarette Retailers Can Challenge FDA Order in Fifth Circuit
  • Supreme Court Expands Judicial Review of Agency Actions
  • Supreme Court Pauses Order Reinstating CPSC Commissioners

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising