Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

Supreme Court to Consider Tax Exemptions for Religious Organizations

The Supreme Court recently agreed to consider Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission. The closely watched First Amendment case involves the availability of tax exemptions for religious organizations and marks the first religious case taken up by the Court this term.

Facts of the Case

Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. (CCB), along with four of its sub-entities, seek an exemption from having to pay unemployment tax to cover their employees. They assert that they are exempt from coverage under Wisconsin’s Unemployment Compensation Act because they are operated primarily for religious purposes.

Pursuant to Wis.Stat. § 108.02(15)(h), Wisconsin exempts from its state unemployment tax system certain religious organizations that are “operated, supervised, controlled, or principally supported by a church or convention or association of churches” and that are also “operated primarily for religious purposes.” The Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) concluded that CCB and the four sub-entities were not “operated primarily for religious purposes” and thus not exempt from making contributions to the state unemployment insurance system.

Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Decision

CCB and the sub-entities sought judicial review. They argued that they are “operated primarily for religious purposes” because the Diocese of Superior’s motivation is primarily religious, i.e., their charitable works are carried out to operationalize Catholic principles. They further contended that a contrary interpretation would run afoul of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 18 of the Wisconsin Constitution.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court reinstated the decision of the LIRC. It held that CCB is not “operated primarily for religious purposes” and thus does not qualify for the tax exemption. Specifically, the court held that CCB’ activities are not “typical” religious activities because it serves and employs non-Catholics. It further found that CCB does not “attempt to imbue program participants with the Catholic faith,” and its services to the poor and needy could also be provided by secular organizations.

Issue Before the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court granted certiorari on December 13, 2024. The justices agreed to consider the following question: “Whether a state violates the First Amendment’s religion clauses by denying a religious organization an otherwise-available tax exemption because the organization does not meet the state’s criteria for religious behavior.”

Oral arguments have not yet been scheduled. An opinion is scheduled before the end of the term in June/July 2025.

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising