Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

June 24, 2025 | SCOTUS Holds Wire Fraud Statute Doesn’t Require Proof Victim Suffered Economic Loss

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

James Iredell

James Iredell

Early Life

James Iredell was born on October 5, 1751, in Lewes, England. After immigrating to the United States in 1767 at the age of 17, Iredell found work at a customs house in North Carolina. He began studying law at this time under future North Carolina governor Samuel Johnston, and he was licensed to practice in 1771. Iredell married Johnston sister Hannah in 1773, and the couple went on to have four children together.

Revolutionary War and Early Career

While practicing law in the early 1770s, Iredell gained prominence as a strong supporter of independence and the revolution against Great Britain. He published To the Inhabitants of Great Britain in 1774 at the age of 23, outlining his arguments against Parliamentary Supremacy.

During the Revolutionary War, Iredell was heavily involved in the North Carolina state government. He was elected to a commission to draft and revise the state’s laws in 1776, and later became a judge of the superior court in 1778 and the state’s Attorney General in 1779.

Powell became a strong supporter of the proposed Constitution at the 1987 Philadelphia Convention. He wrote extensively on his opinions for adopting a new government, which was later published as Iredell’s Revisal in 1791.

Supreme Court

President Washington nominated Iredell to the United States Supreme Court in 1790, and Justice Iredell officially began his post on May 12, 1790. At the age of 38, Iredell was the youngest of the original Supreme Court justices.

Justice Iredell’s first Supreme Court hearing came in the 1791 West v. Barnes case, a minor case that was decided on procedural grounds. In the 1793 Chisholm v. Georgia case regarding the right for citizens of one state to sue another state in federal court, Iredell served as the only dissent. The majority ruled in favor of Chisholm, though the ruling was dismissed with the passing of the Eleventh Amendment in 1795.

Perhaps Iredell’s most important opinion came in the Calder v. Bull case of 1798. The Court’s decision was unanimous, holding that the ex post facto clause of the U.S. Constitution applies to criminal cases and not civil cases. Iredell’s opinion in this case went on to help establish the principle of judicial review, the approach that is still used today.

Death

The heavy travel burdens in the late 1790s caused Justice Iredell’s health to deteriorate. He died suddenly on October 20, 1799 in his home state of North Carolina at the young age of 48.

Notable Cases:

West v. Barnes (1791)

Chisholm v. Georgia (1793)

Hylton v. United States (1796)

Calder v. Bull (1798)

Previous Articles

SCOTUS Holds Wire Fraud Statute Doesn’t Require Proof Victim Suffered Economic Loss
by DONALD SCARINCI on June 17, 2025

In Kousisis v. United States, 605 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a defendant wh...

Read More
SCOTUS Considers Birthright Citizenship
by DONALD SCARINCI on June 13, 2025

On May 15, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Trump v. CASA, Inc., Trump v. Washi...

Read More
SCOTUS Sides with Military Reservist in Differential Pay Dispute
by DONALD SCARINCI on June 5, 2025

In Feliciano v. Department of Transportation, 605 U.S. ____ (2025), a divided U.S. Supreme Court he...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising