Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Stanley Matthews

Stanley Matthews (1881-1889)

Thomas Stanley Matthews lived from 1824 to 1889.

Early Life and Legal Career

Matthews was born in Cincinnati, Ohio. He enrolled in Kenyon College as a junior and graduated at age sixteen. Matthews read law in Ohio prior to moving to Tennessee, where he was admitted to the bar at age eighteen. After practicing in Tennessee for five years, Matthews returned to Ohio where he became an editor for the Cincinnati Herald, a local newspaper. He held several public service offices, including clerk of the Ohio House of Representatives and county judge in Hamilton County. After being elected to the Ohio State Senate for the first district, where he served from 1856 to 1858, Matthews was appointed as the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio.

He served as U.S. Attorney from 1858 to 1861, before resigning to serve as a lieutenant colonel with the 23rd Ohio Infantry Regiment of the Union Army during the Civil War. In 1861, Matthews was appointed colonel of the 51st Ohio Infantry Regiment. As colonel, Matthews led a brigade in the Army of the Ohio and the Army of the Cumberland before resigning in 1863.

In 1876, Matthews ran for the United States House of Representatives, but was unsuccessful. One year later, he won a special election to the Senate, filling a vacancy created by the resignation of John Sherman. However, he did not seek reelection.

Appointment to the Supreme Court

President Rutherford B. Hayes nominated Matthews for a position as an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court on January 26, 1881. Matthews was a controversial nominee, as the senate believed that the President nominated Matthews due to their history as classmates at Kenyon College. The nomination came at the end of President Hayes’ term, so the Senate did not act on it. Shortly after, President James A. Garfield succeeded Hayes and renominated Matthews in March 1881. The Senate confirmed him by a 24 to 23 vote, the narrowest confirmation for a successful Supreme Court nominee in history.

Matthews penned the unanimous opinion in Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886). In Yick Wo, the Court struck down a San Francisco ordinance stating that a laundry could not be operated in a wooden building without a permit from the Board of Supervisors. The ordinance was very clearly an attempt to discriminate against the Chinese population of San Francisco, as approximately two-thirds of laundries in the city were owned by Chinese persons. In his opinion, Matthews found that the ordinance discriminated against Chinese persons and, even though some of the laundry owners in this case were not American citizens, they were still protected by the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Matthews served on the Court until his death, a tenure that lasted eight years.

Death

Matthews died on March 22, 1889 at the age of 64. He is buried in Spring Grove Cemetery in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Notable Cases

Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886)

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising