Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

July 30, 2025 | SCOTUS Rejects Non-Delegation Challenge to FCC Telecom Access Program

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

James Clark McReynolds

James Clark McReynolds (1914-1941)

Lived from 1862 to 1946.

Early Life and Legal Career

James C. McReynolds was born in Elkton, Kentucky. After graduating from Vanderbilt University in 1882 as valedictorian, McReynolds then enrolled in the University of Virginia School of Law. He completed his studies in fourteen months, and, once again, graduated in 1884 at the head of his class.

McReynolds began practicing law in Nashville, where he also served as secretary to Senator Howell Edmunds Jackson, who later went on to become an associate justice himself. After an unsuccessful ran for Congress in 1896, McReynolds began serving as Assistant Attorney General under President Theodore Roosevelt. Eventually, McReynolds went back into private practice and was retained by the U.S. government for matters relating to antitrust laws. In 1913, President Woodrow Wilson appointed McReynolds to the position of U.S. Attorney General.

Appointed to the Supreme Court

McReynolds was appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States by President Wilson on August 19, 1914. During the 27 years he spent on the Court, McReynolds authored 506 decisions and 157 dissents–93 of which were against the New Deal.  McReynolds was eventually labeled one of the “Four Horsemen,” a group of conservative members on the Supreme Court that consistently struck down New Deal legislation.

McReynolds authored two early decisions using the Fourteenth Amendment to help protect civil liberties: Meyer v. Nebraska and Pierce v. Society of Sisters. Meyer involved a state law that prohibited the teaching of modern foreign languages in public schools. Meyer, who taught German in a Lutheran school, was convicted under the law. In the Court’s opinion, McReynolds wrote that the liberty guaranteed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment included an individual’s right “to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, to establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his conscience, and generally enjoy privilege, essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.” This decision survived the post-Lochner era.

Death

McReynolds died in Washington, D.C. on August 24, 1946 at age 84.

Previous Articles

SCOTUS Holds LGBTQ+ Curriculum With No Opt-Out Violates Free Exercise Clause
by DONALD SCARINCI on July 22, 2025

In Mahmoud v. Taylor, 606 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court sided with parents challenging t...

Read More
SCOTUS Birthright Citizenship Decision Limits Lower Courts’ Power to Issue Nationwide Injunctions
by DONALD SCARINCI on July 16, 2025

In Trump v. CASA, Inc., 606 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court granted the Government’s app...

Read More
Supreme Court Upholds Tennessee Law Banning Transgender Care for Minors
by DONALD SCARINCI on July 10, 2025

In United States v. Skrmetti, 605 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Tennessee’s ...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising