Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

George Sutherland

George Sutherland (1922-1938)

Lived from 1862 to 1942.

Early Life and Legal Career

George Sutherland was born in Stony Stratford, Buckinghamshire, England. Sutherland and his family moved to Springville, Utah in 1863, before relocating once again to Montana. He graduated from Brigham Young Academy in 1881, before moving to Michigan to enroll in the University of Michigan Law School, where he was a student of Thomas M. Cooley. Sutherland left the school before earning his law degree, but was nonetheless admitted to the Michigan bar.

After passing the bar, Sutherland moved to Utah where he began to practice law. In 1900, he was nominated as the Republican party’s candidate for Utah’s seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. He won in a narrow victory, but only served one term after deciding to successfully pursue a seat on the Senate. Sutherland is credited with having introduced the Nineteenth Amendment, which forbid the government from discriminating against voters on the basis of sex.

Appointment to the Supreme Court

President Warren G. Harding appointed Sutherland to the Supreme Court of the United States on September 5, 1922. During his time on the Court, Sutherland is perhaps best remembered for consistently striking down President Roosevelt’s “New Deal” legislation until retiring in 1938. Sutherland authored several important decisions while on the bench. One of those decisions, Powell v. Alabama, overturned a conviction in the Scottsboro Boys Case, as the defendant, Ozie Powell, had been deprived of his right to counsel. Additionally, in U.S. v. Curtis-Wright Export Corp., Sutherland wrote the majority decision, which gave the president wide powers in conducting foreign affairs.

Death

Sutherland died of a heart attack on July 17, 1942. He was interred at Abbey Mausoleum in Arlington County, Virginia. In 1958, his remains were removed and reburied at Cedar Hill Cemetery near Suitland, Maryland.

Notable Cases

Powell v. Alabama (1932)

U.S. v. Curtis-Wright Export Corp. (1936)

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising