Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Charles Curtis

Charles Curtis - Great American Biographies

Charles Curtis served as 31st Vice President of the United States, holding the office from 1929-1933 under President Herbert Hoover. Curtis was the first person with significant Native American ancestry to reach the White House.

Early Life

Charles Curtis was born in Topeka, Kansas, on January 25, 1860. His mother was one-quarter Kansa Indian, and Curtis spent some of his childhood years living with the Kaw Indian tribe. After attending school in Topeka, Curtis studied law and was admitted to the Kansas bar in 1881. He subsequently launched his own criminal law firm. In 1884, Curtis married Anna Baird. They had three children and also assumed custody of Curtis’ half-sister Dolly when her mother died.

Political Career

Curtis entered politics as county attorney of Shawnee county, holding the position from 1884 to 1888. He was elected to the United States House of Representatives in 1893 and won reelection for the next six terms. While serving in the House, Curtis played a key role in the passage of the “Act for the Protection of the People of Indian Territory,” which became known as the Curtis Act. It amended the Dawes Act to abolish the tribal governments of the Five Civilized Tribes of Indian Territory and provided for allotment of communal land to individual tribal members. While Curtis believed that education and assimilation was in the best interests of Native Americans, he later wrote that the final bill did not reflect his intentions.

In 1907, Curtis was elected by the Kansas Legislature to the U.S. Senate seat vacated by Joseph R. Burton. Curtis was reelected and served until March 4, 1913. In 1912, Democrats took over the Kansas legislature, thwarting Curtis’ bid for reelection. Following the 1913 enactment of the 17th Amendment, which established the direct election of U.S. Senators, Curtis won back a Kansas Senate seat via the popular vote. He went on to serve from March 4, 1915 to March 3, 1929.

Curtis served as Senate Minority Whip from 1915 to 1925 and then as Senate Majority Leader from 1925 to 1929. While Curtis was a “stand patter” that could be counted on by the Republican party, he was also known for being able to successfully negotiate with the party’s progressives and his Democratic colleagues.

Vice Presidency

Curtis opposed Herbert Hoover for the Republic nomination for President in 1928. However, he came in second and was subsequently nominated to run for Vice President alongside Hoover. They won by a landslide, with an electoral vote tally of 444 to 87.

Once in office, the former rivals failed to develop a close relationship. Although Curtis was invited to attend some cabinet meetings, he played a limited role in the Hoover Administration. His chief responsibility was to preside over the Senate, where he cast a few tie-breaking votes. Compared to his prior political positions, Curtis found the Vice Presidency to be unfulfilling.

Hoover and Curtis lost their reelection bid 1932, largely due to the Administration’s failure to lead the country out of the Great Depression. They lost by a wide margin to the Democratic ticket of Franklin D. Roosevelt and John Nance Garner. After leaving office, Curtis resumed the practice of law in Washington, D.C. He died on February 8, 1936 of a heart attack.

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising