Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

July 16, 2025 | SCOTUS Birthright Citizenship Decision Limits Lower Courts’ Power to Issue Nationwide Injunctions

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Philip Pendleton Barbour

Philip Pendleton Barbour - Great American Biographies

Philip Pendleton Barbour (1836-1841) was the Speaker of the House for the Seventeenth Congress before being appointed by Andrew Jackson to serve as an Associate Justice to the United States Supreme Court.

Early Life

Philip Pendleton Barbour was born on March 25th, 1783 near Gordonsville, Virginia. During his undergraduate studies Barbour faced difficult economic circumstances, forcing him to end his studies at the College of William and Mary. As an alternative, Barbour chose to study law with St. George Tucker, a prominent judge and professor of law.

Early Career

After being admitted to the bar in 1800, Barbour practiced law in Kentucky for only two years before moving back to Virginia, where he established his own law office. Thereafter, Barbour started his career in politics, where he served as the state governor and was a member of the Virginia House of Delegates. Then, in 1814, Barbour was elected to serve in the United States House of Representatives, where he proceeded to serve in every term from September 9th, 1814 to March 4th, 1825. During this time, Barbour served as the Speaker of the House for the Seventeenth Congress.

Barbour elected to practice law while he was a member of Congress. While he was a Congressman, Barbour represented the Commonwealth of Virginia in the Cohens v. Virginia case. Consistent with his views that the Constitution limits, rather than expands, the powers of national government, Barbour argued that the Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to review state supreme court decisions implicating Constitutional rights. The Supreme Court rejected this argument and held that pursuant to the Supremacy Clause, the Court has jurisdiction to review all decisions raising Constitutional questions. After serving in the House for the twentieth and twenty-first Congresses, Barbour was appointed as a judge for the United States District Court for Eastern Virginia.

Supreme Court

Andrew Jackson appointed Barbour to the United States Supreme Court in 1836, where he proceeded to serve as an Associate Justice for four years. However, his short time on the bench did not provide him with sufficient time to leave a lasting impact. City of New York v. Miln is the most notable decision Barbour authored during his time on the bench. In Miln, the Court held that notwithstanding the Commerce Clause, a state may regulate commerce in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens. This decision, however, was later overruled by the Court in Edwards v. California.

Death

Barbour died in February of 1841, although it is unknown whether he died on the twenty-fourth or twenty-fifth day of the month. The cause of death was heart disease.

Previous Articles

Supreme Court Upholds Tennessee Law Banning Transgender Care for Minors
by DONALD SCARINCI on July 10, 2025

In United States v. Skrmetti, 605 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Tennessee’s ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rejects Mexico’s Suit Against U.S. Gun Manufacturers
by DONALD SCARINCI on July 8, 2025

In Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, 605 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Co...

Read More
SCOTUS Sides With Employee in Reverse Discrimination Case
by DONALD SCARINCI on July 2, 2025

In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, 605 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held tha...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising