Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

March 6, 2023 | U.S. Supreme Court Takes on Big Tech

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Morrison Remick Waite

Morrison Remick Waite lived between 1816 and 1888, and served as a prominent attorney and the seventh Supreme Court Chief Justice of the United States. Waite oversaw more than 3,000 cases during his tenure as Chief Justice and was responsible for interpreting Reconstruction Amendments and the rights of African Americans following the Civil War.

Early life

Morrison Waite was born in Lyme, Connecticut on November 29, 1816. He attended Yale University through 1837 and became a member of the Skull and Bones and Phi Beta Kappa Society, shedding light on his reputation as a friendly, personable and popular person among his peers. Following his admission to the bar in 1839, he moved to Ohio to start a law practice.

Political Career

Waite ran a prominent law practice in Maumee City, Ohio, and was elected for one term in the Ohio Senate between 1849 and 1850. Waite also ran twice for a seat in the U.S. Senate but was unsuccessful. In 1871, Waite served as counsel for the Alabama Tribunal at Geneva, and his role earned him significant recognition among Americans. Following his return from Europe, Waite presided over the Ohio Constitutional Convention and was nominated by President Ulysses S. Grant to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1874.

Chief Justice

Waite’s tenure as Chief Justice has been characterized as productive and efficient, and he became renowned for his ability to rule and write detailed court opinions quickly and effectively. Waite was considered politically and socially moderate, and this stance was often reflected in his court rulings. For example, Waite’s 1875 decision in Minor v. Happersett upheld a state’s right to deny women suffrage. However, he supported womens’ admission to the Supreme Court bar. Several cases followed the Civil War and Reconstruction, and when it came to cases that involved the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth amendments, he ruled in a manner that restricted the extension of federal powers.
In 1876, many Republican party members urged Waite to run for president, but he turned down the idea.

Death

Waite died of pneumonia on March 23, 1888, and his funeral attracted a large audience of friends and political supporters. He was remembered for his moderate and fair stance on political issues, and his support and advocacy for schools that educated African Americans.

Previous Articles

U.S. Supreme Court Takes on Big Tech
by DONALD SCARINCI on March 6, 2023

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two big cases involving Big Tech this week. The case...

Read More
SCOTUS to Clarify Standard for Determining Whether True Threat Exception Applies
by DONALD SCARINCI on February 27, 2023

The U.S. Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Counterman v. Colorado, which involves the st...

Read More
SCOTUS to Take on Religious Rights in the Workplace
by DONALD SCARINCI on February 21, 2023

The U.S. Supreme Court has added another high-profile case to its docket, agreeing to address the r...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Holds Debts Incurred by Fraud Are Ineligible for Bankruptcy Relief
  • NJ Supreme Court Rules Campus Police Officer Eligible for Arbitration
  • Lorem ipsum
  • Ketanji Brown Jackson to Join SCOTUS as First Black Female Justice

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

con law awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising