Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

July 30, 2025 | SCOTUS Rejects Non-Delegation Challenge to FCC Telecom Access Program

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Stuart Rabner

Stuart Rabner currently serves as Chief Justice of the New Jersey Supreme Court. He joined the Court in 2007 and is currently the state’s longest-serving chief justice.

Early Life

Stuart Rabner was born on June 30, 1960, and grew up in Passaic, New Jersey. He graduated summa cum laude from the School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University in 1982. Three years later, he graduated cum laude from Harvard Law School. Chief Justice Rabner married Dr. Deborah Ann Wiener in 1989, and the couple has three children.

Legal Career

Rabner started his legal career as a judicial law clerk to Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.  He joined the office of the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey in Newark in 1986. He rose through the ranks to become First Assistant U.S. Attorney and later Chief of the Criminal Division and Terrorism Unit.

Chief Justice Rabner was serving as chief of the Criminal Division when Governor Jon Corzine made him his top legal advisor in January 2006. Later that year, he was named New Jersey attorney general, serving in that role until he joined the Court.

Nomination to New Jersey Supreme Court

On June 4, 2007, Governor Corzine nominated Rabner to serve as Chief Justice of the Court, replacing James R. Zazzali. He was confirmed 36–1 by the New Jersey Senate and sworn in on June 29, 2007. Chief Justice Rabner was nominated for tenure by Governor Chris Christie and sworn in on June 20, 2014.

During his tenure as Chief Justice, Rabner has authored numerous landmark decisions regarding, among other issues, eyewitness identification, right to privacy, same-sex marriage, government transparency, the separation of church and state, and protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. He also guided the Court through the COVID-19 pandemic and has directed Court initiatives related to mental health, technology, and transparency.

Chief Justice Rabner is a member of the Board of Directors of the Institute of Judicial Administration at New York University School of Law. He served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Conference of Chief Justices from 2010 to 2012.

Previous Articles

SCOTUS Holds LGBTQ+ Curriculum With No Opt-Out Violates Free Exercise Clause
by DONALD SCARINCI on July 22, 2025

In Mahmoud v. Taylor, 606 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court sided with parents challenging t...

Read More
SCOTUS Birthright Citizenship Decision Limits Lower Courts’ Power to Issue Nationwide Injunctions
by DONALD SCARINCI on July 16, 2025

In Trump v. CASA, Inc., 606 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court granted the Government’s app...

Read More
Supreme Court Upholds Tennessee Law Banning Transgender Care for Minors
by DONALD SCARINCI on July 10, 2025

In United States v. Skrmetti, 605 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Tennessee’s ...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising