Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Stephen Breyer

Stephen Breyer currently serves as an Associate Justice on the United States Supreme Court, a position he has held since 1994. His extensive legal experience and authorship of several law textbooks have made him an integral member of the Supreme Court.

Early Life

Breyer was born on August 15, 1938, in San Francisco, California. Breyer received Bachelor’s degrees from both Stanford University and later Magdalen College at Oxford University before receiving his law degree from Harvard Law School. Following graduation, he clerked for Associate Justice Arthur Goldberg in 1964, and then became special assistant to the United States Assistant Attorney General between 1965 and 1967. In 1973, Breyer served as assistant special prosecutor on the Watergate Special Prosecution Task Force, prior to taking on the role of special counsel for the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary in 1974. Between 1979 and 1980, he served as chief counsel on the committee.

Legal Career

Beginning in 1967, Breyer also taught at various law schools, including Harvard University, the College of Law in Sydney, Australia, the University of Rome, and Tulane University of Law. During this period, he authored two books and a piece of scholarship relating to copyright laws.
Breyer served on the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit between 1980 and 1994. During this period, he also served on several commissions and continued to author important legal documents that have influenced the practice of law today.

Supreme Court Justice

In 1994, President Bill Clinton nominated Breyer to serve as a Justice on the Supreme Court following Harry Blackmun’s retirement. Breyer has been called a pragmatist and noted that he tends to look more closely at the purpose and consequences of a law’s constitutionality rather than the literal text, history, and language. Known as being more liberal than his legal counterparts, he has consistently voted in favor of abortion rights and argued that the Founding Fathers intended to establish a democracy that extended the maximum rights and liberties for its citizens.

Breyer’s rulings also demonstrate that he more frequently defers to Congress and the executive branch at a higher rate than the other Justices on the bench. The same holds true when it comes cases involving the First Amendment and law enforcement, during which times Breyer typically favors the arguments of law enforcement.

When Breyer is not in court, he spends a great deal of his time writing and authoring legal books, the latest of which was released in 2010.

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising