Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Alton B. Parker

Alton Brooks Parker

Alton Brooks Parker served as Chief Judge of the New York Court of Appeals from 1898-1904. In 1904, he lost the Presidential election to Theodore Roosevelt in a landslide.

Early Life

Alton B. Parker was born in 1852 on a farm in Cortland, New York. He earned a degree from the Albany Law School in 1873 and opened a successful law practice with a fellow student. Parker later became involved with the Democratic party, supporting Grover Cleveland’s candidacy for Governor and later President.

Political Career

In 1885, Parker managed David B. Hill’s successful campaign to become Governor of New York. With Hill’s support, Parker rose to prominence in the New York court system. In 1897, he was elected chief justice of the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, by an overwhelming margin. During his tenure, Parker was known as a progressive, authoring the opinion upholding New York’s maximum-hours labor law that would later be struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court.

In 1904, Parker’s name was floated as potential Presidential candidate. Judge Parker was a reluctant nominee, previously declining prior offers to run for U.S. Senate and New York Governor in favor of remaining on the bench. Prior to the Democratic Convention, Parker declined to make any public statements concerning his position on key issues facing the country.

Later Career

Parker’s silence on controversial issues, such as the gold standard, ultimately became an asset. When it became clear that Parker was the only candidate who could unify the party, he was selected on the first ballot. As the Democratic candidate, Parker’s campaign was marred by a series of political missteps. While his campaign started to gain traction when Parker accused President Roosevelt’s trust busting crusade of being insincere in light of corporate political contributions, it was too late.

While Parker arguably did as well as any Democrat could have against the popular incumbent, Roosevelt trounced Parker at the polls. Parker earned 5,084,442 votes to Theodore Roosevelt’s 7,628,785. The electoral vote was 336 to 140. After losing his Presidential bid, Parker returned to his legal career and built a successful private practice.

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising