Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 21, 2025 | Supreme Court Sides With FDA on Flavored Vape Denials

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Mark Hanna

Mark Hanna

Mark Hanna was as successful in business as he was in politics, using his money and influence to help William McKinley win two Presidential elections. Nicknamed “Dollar Mark,” Hanna wielded enormous political power and served as one of President McKinley’s closest advisors. Hanna later served as a U.S. Senator and played a pivotal role in the building of the Panama Canal.

Early Life

Marcus “Mark” Alonzo Hanna was born in Ohio in 1837. By the age of 25, Hanna was running his family’s grocery business. After marrying the daughter of a wealthy coal baron, Hanna eventually took over that business as well. By the 1880s, Hanna was one of the country’s most successful industrialists, with interests in coal, iron, and steel.

Career

In the 1860s, Hanna joined the Republican party and gradually turned his attention to politics. In 1896, he officially retired from business to manage the presidential campaign of Ohio governor William McKinley. Hanna’s tactics were unconventional for the time period. He solicited campaign donations from wealthy individuals and corporations to launch one of the most expensive political campaigns of the era. While Democratic nominee William Jennings Bryan travelled the country giving speeches, McKinley sat on his front porch and met voters who traveled to Ohio at Hanna’s expense. Hanna’s tactics were ridiculed in the press; however, the campaign was successful, and McKinley was elected President on November 3, 1896.

Hanna declined a cabinet post in McKinley’s administration. Rather, he filled a vacancy in the U.S. Senate created by another cabinet appointment. As a Senator, Hanna focused on issues of commerce, most notably the proposed Panama Canal. He was such a strong supporter of the proposed canal that his colleagues in the Senate referred to it the “Hannama Canal.”

Later Career

Hanna played a pivotal role in President McKinley’s reelection campaign; however, he was not a fan of his running mate, Theodore Roosevelt. “[T]here’s only one life,” Hanna remarked, “between that madman and the Presidency.” After McKinley’s assassination, many speculated that Hanna might challenge Roosevelt in the 1904 primary. However, Hanna died of typhoid fever in 1904 at the age of 67.

Previous Articles

SCOTUS Agrees to Consider Birthright Citizen Cases
by DONALD SCARINCI on May 21, 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider legal challenges to President Donald Trump’s execut...

Read More
SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act
by DONALD SCARINCI on May 6, 2025

In Trump v. J.G.G., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that non-citizens challenging their removal under ...

Read More
Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising