Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

June 5, 2025 | SCOTUS Sides with Military Reservist in Differential Pay Dispute

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Patrick Henry

Patrick Henry

Patrick Henry played an integral role in America’s fight for independence. However, he was also a staunch opponent of the U.S. Constitution and one of the country’s most vocal Antifederalists.

Early Life

After failing as a planter and a merchant, Henry eventually found success as a lawyer and a politician. Henry served in the Virginia House of Burgesses and the Continental Congress. He was one of the earliest and most vocal critics of British tyranny. He spoke out against the Stamp Act of 1765, arguing that only the colony had the authority to levy taxes on its citizens. While some believed Henry’s statements were treasonous, they ultimately helped spur on the resistance to British rule.

The Virginia Convention

Henry is most famous for the speech he delivered to the Virginia Convention on March 23, 1775 in an effort to convince the state to join the war for independence. He stated:

Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? … Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!

The resolution passed, and Virginia organized a militia to join the fight. With regard to Henry’s impassioned speech, fellow Virginian George Mason wrote: “Every word he says not only engages but commands the attention, and your passions are no longer your own when he addresses them.”

Later Career

Henry served as Governor of Virginia from 1776 to 1779 and from 1784 to 1786. While he was nominated to serve as one of Virginia’s delegates, Patrick Henry did not attend the Constitutional Convention. According to Henry, he “smelt a rat in Philadelphia, tending toward the monarchy.” He was likely referring to Alexander Hamilton, who favored a national government that resembled the British monarchy.

Henry served as a delegate to the Virginia ratifying convention, where he argued vehemently against the Constitution. Henry maintained that the new system of government allocated a dangerous amount of power to the national government and provided too few protections for individual rights. When the Constitution was approved, Henry advocated in favor the Bill of Rights and was instrumental in its passage.

Previous Articles

Will US Supreme Court Allow Religious Charter Schools?
by DONALD SCARINCI on June 3, 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in a key First Amendment case involving the se...

Read More
Supreme Court Sides With FDA on Flavored Vape Denials
by DONALD SCARINCI on May 21, 2025

In Food and Drug Administration v. Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the...

Read More
SCOTUS Agrees to Consider Birthright Citizen Cases
by DONALD SCARINCI on

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider legal challenges to President Donald Trump’s execut...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising