Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Alfred Moore

Alfred Moore

Early Life

Alfred Moore was born on May 21, 1755, in New Hanover County, North Carolina. Moore received his early education in Boston before returning to North Carolina to study law under his father, a former colonial judge. Moore was admitted to the bar in 1775 but delayed starting his practice to join the war. From 1775 to 1782 Moore served in a number of ranks including officer of the First North Carolina Regiment.

Legal Career

Following the war, Moore was elected to the North Carolina General Assembly. In 1782, Moore succeeded James Iredell, a future Supreme Court Justice, in the position of North Carolina Attorney General. Moore served as Attorney General until his resignation in 1791. Moore maintained that the General Assembly’s creation of solicitor general in 1790 infringed upon his duties.

Quickly following his resignation as Attorney General, Moore was elected to the North Carolina House of Commons. Three years later in 1794 Moore ran as the Federalist candidate for the North Carolina United States Senate, but lost by only one vote. Moore then served as a Superior Court Judge from 1798 to 1799.

Supreme Court

Following the sudden death of Supreme Court Associate Justice James Iredell in late 1799, President Adams nominated Moore to fill the vacant seat. Moore accepted, and his tenure as U.S. Supreme Court Justice officially began on April 21, 1800.

Due to poor health, Moore’s contribution as Supreme Court Justice was limited. He served on his post for only four years, and during that time only issued one opinion. That opinion came in the 1800 Bas v. Tingy case regarding a conflict with France. Justice Moore supported the majority opinion in the court that a partial, limited war had broken out with France.

During the Marbury v. Madison (1803) hearing, undoubtedly the most important case during Moore’s tenure on the Supreme Court, Moore reportedly missed the arguments due to illness.

Death

Moore resigned from the Supreme Court on January 26, 1804, citing issues with deteriorating health. He died in Bladen County, North Carolina on October 15, 1810.

Notable Cases:

Bas v. Tingy (1800)

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising