Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Benjamin Robbins Curtis

Benjamin Robbins Curtis (1851-1857)

Benjamin Robbins Curtis lived from 1809 to 1874.

Early Life

Curtis was born on November 4, 1809 in Watertown, Massachusetts to Lois Robbins and Benjamin Curtis, who was the captain of a merchant vessel. As a young boy, Curtis attended common school in Newton. Following common school, he attended Harvard College (now Harvard University). Curtis graduated from Harvard in 1829 as a member of the Phi Beta Kappa society.

Legal Career

Curtis earned his law degree from Harvard Law School in 1831, and was admitted to the bar the following year. Shortly thereafter, Curtis moved to Boston, where he joined the Charles P. Curtis law firm. During his time spent at the firm, he became an expert in both admiralty and patent law. In 1846, Curtis became a member of the Harvard Society of Fellows. He was elected to the Massachusetts House of Representatives three years later.

Appointment to the Supreme Court

On September 22, 1851, following the death of Levi Woodbury, Curtis received a recess appointment to the Supreme Court from President Millard Fillmore. Notably, he became the first Supreme Court Justice to have earned a law degree—his predecessors had either served as apprentices, or had attended law school without receiving a degree.

Curtis is best known for being one of two Supreme Court Justices that dissented in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). In his dissent, he argued against the majority’s denial of the bid for emancipation on behalf of slave Dred Scott. Curtis believed that all African American citizens in both the North and South were among the “people of the United States” whom the Constitution addressed. Deeply bothered by ruling of the case, Curtis resigned from the Supreme Court on September 30, 1857—making him the only Supreme Court Justice to have resigned on a matter of principle.

Later Years

Following his resignation, Curtis returned to private practice in Boston. There he became one of the nation’s “leading lawyers,” arguing several cases before the Supreme Court. In 1868, Curtis acted as chief counsel for President Andrew Johnson during his impeachment trial. On behalf of Jackson, Curtis argued that an impeachment was a judicial act, rather than a political one, and it should therefore require a full hearing of evidence.

Death

Curtis passed away on September 15, 1874. He is buried at Mount Auburn Cemetery in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Notable Cases

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising