Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

David Souter

David Souter served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court from 1990 until 2009. During his time on the Court, Souter sat on both the Rehnquist and Roberts courts and aligned himself with both conservative and liberal justices on varying issues.

Early Years

Souter was born on September 17, 1939 in Melrose, Massachusetts, but spent most of his childhood in New Hampshire. Souter attended Harvard College where he studied philosophy, writing his senior thesis on the legal positivism of Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. He graduated from Harvard magna cum laude in 1961. Souter was subsequently selected as a Rhodes Scholar and received a Bachelor of Arts in 1963 from Magdalen College in Oxford. He then went on to study at Harvard Law School, graduating in 1966.

Legal Career

Souter worked for two years for a private law firm in Concord, New Hampshire but quickly realized that he disliked private practice. He then decided to pursue a career in public service, serving as an Assistant Attorney General of New Hampshire. In 1971, Souter was selected by then Attorney General of New Hampshire, Warren Rudman, to be his Deputy Attorney General. In 1976, he succeeded Rudman as New Hampshire Attorney General. Two years later, Souter was named an Associate Justice of the Superior Court of New Hampshire. By 1983, he was named to the New Hampshire Supreme Court as an Associate Justice. Soon after George H.W. Bush was sworn in as President, he nominated Souter to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

Supreme Court Justice

After being nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court by President George H.W. Bush, Souter took his seat on the bench on October 9, 1990. Identifying as a Republican, Souter was expected to side with other conservative justices, and did so during his early years on the Court. In 1992, however, Souter co-authored the Court’s opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, affirming Roe v. Wade’s decision that a right to an abortion is protected by the Constitution. By the late 1990’s, Souter had begun to align himself more consistently with the liberal Justices. In 2000, Souter dissented in Bush v. Gore, arguing for the recount to continue, while the majority voted to end the recount and declared George W. Bush President.

Retirement and Legacy

Although he had been considering retirement for several years, the election of democratic President Barack Obama in 2008 made Souter more inclined retire. In 2009, he sent his retirement letter to President Obama, and was succeeded by Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Since his retirement, Souter occasionally sits by designation on panels of the First Circuit Court of Appeals.

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising