Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Harry Blackmun

Harry Blackmun

Early life

Harry A. Blackmun grew up in a working-class suburb of St. Paul, Minnesota. Blackmun attended Harvard where he graduated with a degree in mathematics summa cum laude in 1929. Although he considered going to medical school, Blackmun chose to attend Harvard Law School and graduated in 1932.

Career

After graduating law school, Blackmun clerked for Judge John B. Sanborn of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. After his clerkship ended, he went into private practice where he worked on civil litigation, tax, and trust and estate matters. Blackmun also served as an associate professor at both the William Mitchell College of Law and University of Minnesota Law School.

After spending a number of years in private practice at the firm now known as Dorsey & Whitney, Blackmun became counsel for the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota from 1950 to 1959. In 1959, President Dwight D. Eisenhower appointed Blackmun to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit. He authored 217 opinions. Eleven years later in 1970, President Richard Nixon appointed Blackmun to the Supreme Court of the United States.

Supreme Court

Blackmun joined the Supreme Court at the time when Warren Burger, Blackmun’s childhood friend and best man at his wedding, was Chief Justice. Blackmun and Chief Justice Burger were often referred to as the “Minnesota Twins.” Blackmun had been a Republican his whole life, and it was expected he would follow along with the conservatives on the Supreme Court. This was the case early on in his career as a Justice, such as when he dissented with Burger and two others in Furman v. Georgia, which declared all capital punishment unconstitutional. Blackmun’s conservative ideology seemed to slowly change the longer he was on the court. Most notably, in 1973 Blackmun authored the majority decision in Roe v. Wade, a landmark case that invalidated a Texas statute that made abortion in most circumstances illegal.

In later cases heard by the Court, Blackmun’s vote always preserved the integrity of Roe v. Wade. In 1989 he wrote a dissent in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, articulating his fears that the Court was trying to overrule Roe. Also, in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), Blackmun fiercely criticized the majority for their attack and almost overturning of the Roe decision.

In 1993, Blackmun argued in Herrera v. Collins that refusing to allow convicted prisoners to introduce new evidence to prove their innocence could be considered “perilously close to simple murder.” Herrera v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390, 446 (1993).

In one of his most famous dissents, Blackmun wrote of his despair for a young child who was left with severe brain-damage after Child Services failed to take away custody from his abusive father. Blackmun’s distress for this young boy was evidenced by one of the phrases used in his dissent. “Poor Joshua!,” was referenced by many when discussing both the case and Blackmun’s history on the Supreme Court. Deshaney v. Winnebago County Dep’t of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189, 213 (1989).

In 1994, after serving as a Justice for 24 years, Blackmun retired.

Later years

In 1997, Blackmun starred in a Steven Spielberg film called Amistad where he portrayed Justice Joseph Story. He is the only Supreme Court justice to play a judge in a film. After hip surgery in 1999 where he suffered complications, Blackmun passed away on March 4, 1999. He is buried at Arlington National Cemetery.

In 2004, the Library of Congress released Blackmun’s extensive files to the public. These files included notes on every Supreme Court case heard while Blackmun was a Justice as well as other documents that gave the public an inside look at the Supreme Court during Blackmun’s term.

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising