Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

John Paul Stevens

John Paul Stevens

Early life

John Paul Stevens was born on April 20, 1920 in Chicago, Illinois. He was born into an upper class family, deriving their wealth from insurance and hotel businesses. His family owned their own hotel in Chicago, the Stevens Hotel. Stevens’ interest in the judicial system arose from his father’s conviction of embezzlement, which was later overturned.

In 1941, Stevens graduated from the University of Chicago with a bachelor of arts in English. A year later, he married Elizabeth Sheeren, with whom he had four children. During World War II, Stevens enlisted in the Navy and was award the Bronze Star for his work as a cryptographer.

After returning from war, he attended Northwestern University School of Law. Two years later, he graduated at the top of his class. After graduation, he clerked for Supreme Court Justice Wiley B. Rutledge.

Career

After his clerkship, Stevens joined a Chicago antitrust law firm. After a few years, he left and started his own firm. As his reputation grew, he was appointed as special counsel for the House of Representatives and the United States Attorney General. In 1970, after achieving success as special counsel, Richard Nixon appointed Stevens to the United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

Supreme Court

In 1975, Stevens was appointed by Gerald Ford to fill the vacancy left by William O. Douglas on the United States Supreme Court. His nomination was affirmed by the United States Senate and Stevens took his oath on December 19, 1975.

Initially thought of as a conservative, Stevens could not be pigeonholed during his time on the bench. He took an individualist approach and fluctuated between conservative and liberal views. During his final years on the Roberts’ court, Stevens consistently ruled as a moderate.

On June 29, 2010, Stevens retired from the Supreme Court. After 34 years, 6 months, and 10 days of service, Stevens is tied for second longest continuous tenure on the bench.

Notable cases

FCC v. Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978).

Wrote majority opinion holding that the FCC had the power to regulate content transmitted over the airwaves. It gave the FCC great latitude to bar indecent speech during hours children regularly watch or listen.

Sony v. Universal Studios, 464 U.S. 417 (1984).

Wrote majority opinion holding held consumers could record programs for their own personal use without perpetrating copyright infringement. Set the stage for technological advancement of DVR.

Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997).

Wrote majority opinion holding a sitting president can be civilly sued for conduct prior to presidency. Additionally, it held that separation of powers does not require the suit to be withheld until after the president’s term concludes.

Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002).

Wrote majority opinion holding the execution of a mentally disabled person violated the Eighth Amendment because it was cruel and unusual punishment.

Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).

Wrote majority opinion holding the city’s use of eminent domain was constitutional, even though the land was not taken for government purposes. The land was taken a private corporation, which economic revitalization the area through redevelopment. The court found that economic revitalization fell within a taking for “public purpose.”

Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000).

Wrote dissent believing the court and its justices should not decide an election.

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010).

In a 90 page dissent, Stevens wrote that corporations must be kept out of the democratic process because they undermined the principles of self-government.

Later years

Since retiring from the Supreme Court, Stevens has written two books: a memoir and a critique of the United States Constitution. In 2014, Stevens spoke out against the Supreme Court’s recent opinion which deregulated political campaign financing.

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising