Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Owen Roberts

Owen Roberts (1930-1945)

Lived from 1875 to 1955.

Early Years

Owen Roberts was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on May 2, 1875. After receiving his bachelor’s degree from the University of Pennsylvania, Roberts went on to attend the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where he graduated at the top of his class in 1898.

Legal Career

After law school, Roberts served as the first assistant district attorney of Philadelphia, a position he held for three years. Roberts then went on to private practice, founding the firm known today as Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP. There, he established a nationally recognized reputation as a gifted trial lawyer. Embodying his academic and studious approach to law, Roberts also held a part time position as a professor at his alma mater for over twenty years.

Appointment to the Supreme Court

At the age of 55, Roberts was appointed to the Supreme Court by President Herbert Hoover and confirmed by the Senate on June 2, 1930. On the highest court in the land, Roberts was often a swing vote. One of the most notable cases in which Roberts’ position was decisive was West Coast Hotel v. Parish in 1937. In West Coast Hotel, Roberts voted to uphold the constitutionality of minimum wage laws, switching his position on the constitutionality of the New Deal. Roberts also authored the majority opinion in New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co., which safeguarded the right to boycott. Later, in Korematsu v. United States, the Court upheld an Executive Order ordering Japanese Americans into internment camps during World War II. Roberts, one of three dissenters, recognized that the defendant was being punished based solely upon his ancestry.

Later Years and Death

Roberts retired from the court in 1945, later serving as the Dean of the University of Pennsylvania Law school from 1948 to 1951. He died in Chester County, Pennsylvania on May 17, 1955 after a four-month illness.

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising