Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Rufus Wheeler Peckham

Rufus Wheeler Peckham (1896-1909)

Rufus W. Peckham lived from 1838 to 1909.

Early Life and Legal Career

Peckham was born in Albany, New York to Rufus Wheeler Peckham and Isabella Adeline; his mother died when he was only nine. After graduating from the Albany Academy, Peckham studied law under his father. He was admitted to the bar in 1859.

Following ten years in private practice, Peckham served as Albany’s district attorney from 1869 to 1872. He then returned to private practice, serving as counsel to the City of Albany until being elected as a trial judge on the New York Supreme Court in 1883. Shortly thereafter, in 1886, Peckham was elected to the New York Court of Appeals, New York’s highest court. Peckham was also active in local Democratic politics, serving as New York’s delegate to the 1876 Democratic National Convention.

Appointment to the Supreme Court

In 1896, Peckham was appointed to the Supreme Court by President Grover Cleveland. His most famous opinion was in Lochner v. New York. There, the Court invalidated a limitation on bakers’ working hours to sixty per week as being contrary to the individual right to freely contract, and as being unnecessary to protect health or safety. In the same opinion, Peckham upheld other workplace regulations relating to baker’s facilities that he did not believe justified limitations on the freedom of contract.

Aside from Lochner, Peckham is known for his expansive interpretation of the Sherman antitrust law, in which he aimed to protect consumer welfare. Peckham also authored the revolutionary decision in Ex parte Young, which held that a federal court may issue an injunction against a State officer to prevent the enforcement of an invalid State law.

Death

Peckham served on the Court until his death on October 24, 1909 at age 70. He was buried in Albany Rural Cemetery in Menands, New York.

Notable Cases

Lochner v. New York (1905)

Ex parte Young (1908)

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising