Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
    • First Ladies
    • Signers of the U.S. Constitution
    • Signers of the Declaration of Independence
    • Delegates of the U.S. Constitution
    • Misc – Great American Bios
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

November 27, 2025 | SCOTUS Adds Second Amendment Case to Docket

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Rufus Wheeler Peckham

Rufus Wheeler Peckham (1896-1909)

Rufus W. Peckham lived from 1838 to 1909.

Early Life and Legal Career

Peckham was born in Albany, New York to Rufus Wheeler Peckham and Isabella Adeline; his mother died when he was only nine. After graduating from the Albany Academy, Peckham studied law under his father. He was admitted to the bar in 1859.

Following ten years in private practice, Peckham served as Albany’s district attorney from 1869 to 1872. He then returned to private practice, serving as counsel to the City of Albany until being elected as a trial judge on the New York Supreme Court in 1883. Shortly thereafter, in 1886, Peckham was elected to the New York Court of Appeals, New York’s highest court. Peckham was also active in local Democratic politics, serving as New York’s delegate to the 1876 Democratic National Convention.

Appointment to the Supreme Court

In 1896, Peckham was appointed to the Supreme Court by President Grover Cleveland. His most famous opinion was in Lochner v. New York. There, the Court invalidated a limitation on bakers’ working hours to sixty per week as being contrary to the individual right to freely contract, and as being unnecessary to protect health or safety. In the same opinion, Peckham upheld other workplace regulations relating to baker’s facilities that he did not believe justified limitations on the freedom of contract.

Aside from Lochner, Peckham is known for his expansive interpretation of the Sherman antitrust law, in which he aimed to protect consumer welfare. Peckham also authored the revolutionary decision in Ex parte Young, which held that a federal court may issue an injunction against a State officer to prevent the enforcement of an invalid State law.

Death

Peckham served on the Court until his death on October 24, 1909 at age 70. He was buried in Albany Rural Cemetery in Menands, New York.

Notable Cases

Lochner v. New York (1905)

Ex parte Young (1908)

Previous Articles

Key Takeaways from Oral Arguments in Court’s Controversial Voting-Rights Case
by DONALD SCARINCI on November 12, 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Louisiana v. Callais, which involves a key ...

Read More
Key Cases to Watch During the Supreme Court’s November Sitting
by DONALD SCARINCI on November 5, 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court’s November sitting begins on November 3 and concludes on November 12, 2025...

Read More
SCOTUS Clears Way to Terminate Protected Status for Venezuelan Nationals
by DONALD SCARINCI on October 29, 2025

On October 3, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court granted an emergency request from the Trump Administrati...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of First Step Act to Vacated Sentences
  • SCOTUS Rules E-Cigarette Retailers Can Challenge FDA Order in Fifth Circuit
  • Supreme Court Expands Judicial Review of Agency Actions
  • Supreme Court Pauses Order Reinstating CPSC Commissioners

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising