Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

June 5, 2025 | SCOTUS Sides with Military Reservist in Differential Pay Dispute

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Samuel Blatchford

Samuel Blatchford (1882-1893)

Samuel Blatchford lived from 1820 to 1893.

Early Life and Legal Career

Blatchford was born in Auburn, New York, where his father was a well-known attorney. He began attending Columbia College at the age of thirteen, where he was a member of the Philolexian Society. He graduated from Columbia at age seventeen.

In 1840, Blatchford served as private secretary to Governor William H. Seward. While working under the governor, Blatchford read law, and eventually entered into private practice with his father and uncle. In 1854, he moved to New York City, where he started the law firm of Blatchford, Seward & Griswold–now known as Cravath, Swaine & Moore. Blatchford developed a reputation for preparing summaries of United States circuit court cases, and served as reporter of decisions for the Circuit Court in New York. In addition, he developed a successful admiralty and patent law practice.

In 1867, President Andrew Johnson appointment Blatchford to a seat on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In 1878, President Rutherford B. Hayes promoted Blatchford to serve as Circuit Judge of the Second U.S. Judicial Circuit.

Appointment to the Supreme Court

In 1882, Blatchford was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Chester A. Arthur, making him the first person to serve at all three levels of the federal judiciary: as District Judge, Circuit Judge, and Supreme Court Justice.

Blatchford spent eleven years on the bench, writing 430 opinions and two dissents. His most famous opinions include Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minnesota and Budd v. People of New York. However, both opinions were criticized for their contradictory conclusions regarding the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Death

Blatchford died on July 7, 1893 in Newport, Rhode Island, at the age of seventy-three.

Notable Cases

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. (1890)

Budd v. People of New York (1892)

Previous Articles

Will US Supreme Court Allow Religious Charter Schools?
by DONALD SCARINCI on June 3, 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in a key First Amendment case involving the se...

Read More
Supreme Court Sides With FDA on Flavored Vape Denials
by DONALD SCARINCI on May 21, 2025

In Food and Drug Administration v. Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the...

Read More
SCOTUS Agrees to Consider Birthright Citizen Cases
by DONALD SCARINCI on

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider legal challenges to President Donald Trump’s execut...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising