Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

June 13, 2025 | SCOTUS Considers Birthright Citizenship

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Samuel Freeman Miller

Samuel Freeman Miller (1862-1890)

Samuel Miller lived from 1816 to 1890.

Early Life

Miller was born on April 5, 1816 in Richmond, Kentucky. Miller was trained as a physician, earning his medical degree from Transylvania University in Lexington. While practicing medicine, Miller studied law on his own, ultimately passing the Kentucky bar exam in 1847. Before moving to Iowa, Miller, an abolitionist, freed his own slaves, so that he would not have to submit to Kentucky’s strong position on slavery. Although Miller never sought political office, he was very active in the creation of Iowa’s Republican Party.

Appointment to the Supreme Court

On July 16, 1862, shortly after the beginning of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln nominated Miller to the Supreme Court. Miller’s reputation was so impressive that the Senate confirmed his appointment half an hour after receiving the nomination.

Miller’s political positions strongly favored those of President Lincoln during the Civil War. In example, he voted to uphold the suspension of habeas corpus and trials by military commission during wartime. However, he later joined the majority opinions in United States v. Cruikshank and the Civil Rights Cases, which held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not give the government the power to prevent private discrimination against African Americans. In Ex Parte Yarbrough, Miller changed his view, holding that the United States government had broad power to prevent the Ku Klux Klan and other private groups from violently interfering with African Americans’ right to vote.

After the 1876 presidential election between Rutherford Hayes and Samuel Tilden, Miller served on the electoral commission that awarded Hayes, the Republican, the disputed electoral votes.

Death

Miller died on October 13, 1890 in Washington D.C. while still on the bench. He is buried at Oakland Cemetery in Keokuk, Iowa.

Notable Cases

Slaughterhouse Cases (1873)

Murdock v. Memphis (1874)

United States v. Kagama (1886)

In re Burrus (1890)

Previous Articles

SCOTUS Sides with Military Reservist in Differential Pay Dispute
by DONALD SCARINCI on June 5, 2025

In Feliciano v. Department of Transportation, 605 U.S. ____ (2025), a divided U.S. Supreme Court he...

Read More
Will US Supreme Court Allow Religious Charter Schools?
by DONALD SCARINCI on June 3, 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in a key First Amendment case involving the se...

Read More
Supreme Court Sides With FDA on Flavored Vape Denials
by DONALD SCARINCI on May 21, 2025

In Food and Drug Administration v. Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising