Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 21, 2025 | Supreme Court Sides With FDA on Flavored Vape Denials

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Tom Campbell Clark

Tom Campbell Clark (1949-1967)

Tom C. Clark served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court from 1949 until 1967. Clark was instrumental in drafting several opinions for ground-breaking cases while on the bench.

Early Years

Clark was born on September 23, 1899 in Dallas, Texas. In 1918, he volunteered to serve in World War I with the U.S. Army. Clark later served with the Texas National Guard as an infantryman, and eventually advanced to the rank of sergeant. After the war, Clark attended the University of Texas at Austin, where he received an A.B. degree in 1921. He then decided to study law at the University of Texas School of Law, and was subsequently admitted to the Texas bar.

Legal Career

Clark practiced as a private attorney for several years. He left private practice in 1927 to serve as a civil district attorney in Dallas, but returned once again in 1932. In 1937, Clark joined the Justice Department as a special assistant to the U.S. Attorney General. After Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Japanese in 1941, Clark was appointed to the Alien Enemy Control Program, which oversaw the internment of Japanese Americans on the west coast. He later stated that the internment program was a mistake by the U.S. Government. In 1945, Clark was appointed by President Harry Truman as U.S. Attorney General, where he played a key role in pioneering the federal government’s support of civil rights enforcement.

Supreme Court Justice

In 1949, Clark was nominated by President Truman to the Supreme Court to serve as an associate justice. For much of his term, Clark served on the bench with Chief Justice Earl Warren. His opinions often varied, making it difficult to classify him as a liberal or conservative. While on the bench, Clark played a significant role in several ground-breaking civil rights cases, including Brown v. Board of Education (1954), Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964) and Katzenbach v McClung (1964). Clark also dissented in the landmark criminal procedure case Miranda v. Arizona, which held that the Constitution ensures an individual the right to remain silent.

Clark’s Constitutional ideology evolved during his time on the bench. Following his retirement, he stated that he came to understand the Constitution as a “living instrument which also must be construed in a manner to meet the practical necessities of the present.”

Death and Legacy

In 1967, Clark assumed senior status, retiring from the Court to avoid a conflict of interest so that his son, Ramsey Clark, could be appointed the U.S. Attorney General. He was succeeded by Thurgood Marshall, who became the first African-American Justice. Clark died on June 13, 1977 in New York City, New York.

Previous Articles

SCOTUS Agrees to Consider Birthright Citizen Cases
by DONALD SCARINCI on May 21, 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider legal challenges to President Donald Trump’s execut...

Read More
SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act
by DONALD SCARINCI on May 6, 2025

In Trump v. J.G.G., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that non-citizens challenging their removal under ...

Read More
Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising