Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

July 2, 2025 | SCOTUS Sides With Employee in Reverse Discrimination Case

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

William Burnham Woods

William Burnham Woods (1881-1887)

William B. Woods lived from 1824 to 1887.

Early Life and Legal Career

Woods was born on August 3, 1824 in Newark, Ohio. He began attending college at Western Reserve University (now Case Western Reserve University) in Hudson, Ohio, but later transferred to Yale University, where he completed his undergraduate education. Upon graduation, Woods returned to Ohio and read law under the tutelage of a prominent local lawyer, S.D. King. He was admitted to the bar in 1847, and entered private practice with King until 1862. Woods, a loyal Democrat, was elected Mayor of Newark in 1856, and to the Ohio General Assembly in 1858.

Stemming from his opposition to slavery, Woods decided that a Union victory was a necessity. In 1862, he left the Ohio state house to join the Union Army. He was appointed lieutenant colonel of the 76th Ohio Infantry, and eventually rose to the rank of Brigadier General before retiring from service and settling in Montgomery, Alabama. After the war, Woods returned to his law practice and took up cotton farming.

Appointment to the Supreme Court

On December 8, 1869, Woods, now a Republican, was appointed by President Ulysses S. Grant to serve as Circuit Judge for the United States Circuit Court for the Fifth Circuit. His service, however, was terminated eleven years later, due to elevation to the United States Supreme Court.

In 1880, Woods was nominated by President Rutherford B. Hayes to serve as a Supreme Court Justice. Unfortunately, Woods failed to have a major impact on the Court. He spent just six years on the bench before his death at the age of 62.

Death

Woods passed away on May 14, 1887 in Washington, D.C.

Previous Articles

Supreme Court Rejects Moment of Threat Doctrine in Deadly Force Case
by DONALD SCARINCI on June 30, 2025

In Barnes v. Felix, 605 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the Fifth Circuit Court o...

Read More
SCOTUS Holds Wire Fraud Statute Doesn’t Require Proof Victim Suffered Economic Loss
by DONALD SCARINCI on June 24, 2025

In Kousisis v. United States, 605 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a defendant wh...

Read More
SCOTUS Holds Wire Fraud Statute Doesn’t Require Proof Victim Suffered Economic Loss
by DONALD SCARINCI on June 17, 2025

In Kousisis v. United States, 605 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a defendant wh...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising