Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

William Cushing

William Cushing

Early Life

William Cushing was born in Scituate, Massachusetts, on March 1, 1732. His father and grandfather were both superior court judges. Cushing graduated from Harvard College in 1751 and was admitted to practice law in 1755.

Legal Career

Cushing worked in a private practice in his hometown for five years before moving to Lincoln County, Massachusetts (present day Maine) in 1760. He practiced law for the next twelve years before being appointed to fill his father’s recently vacated seat on the Superior Court of Massachusetts in 1772.

Cushing would go on to become the court’s Chief Justice in 1777, a position he held until 1789. During his time as Massachusetts Chief Justice, Cushing played a major role in the 1783 court ruling that ended slavery in Massachusetts.

Supreme Court

After the Revolutionary War, President Washington nominated William Cushing to become the first associate justice of the United States Supreme Court. Cushing’s term began on September 26, 1789.

Cushing served as a Justice until his death in 1810, becoming President Washington’s longest serving Supreme Court appointment. In 1796 President Washington nominated Cushing to be Chief Justice, but he declined.

During his time on the Supreme Court, Justice Cushing’s views generally tended towards the views of the Federalist Party. However, because of his frequent travels and health problems, Cushing is only credited with nineteen decisions during his time on the Supreme Court.

Cushing’s two most important decisions came in Chisholm v. Georgia (1793) and Ware v. Hylton (1796). In Chisholm v. Georgia, Cushing voted to allow citizens the right to sue the federal court of another state, a nationalist view in line with the Federalist Party. However, the Eleventh Amendment in 1795 almost immediately dismissed this ruling. In Ware v. Hylton, the court ruled that state laws violating international treaties are unconstitutional. Justice Cushing again held a nationalist opinion.

Death

On September 13, 1810, Cushing died in his hometown of Scituate, Massachusetts, at the age of seventy-eight.

Notable Cases

Chisholm v. Georgia (1793)

Ware v. Hylton (1796)

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising