Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

John Catron

John Catron

Early Life

John Catron was born on January 7, 1786 in Wythe County, Virginia. Catron lived in Kentucky and Tennessee as a child, though little information is known of his upbringing.

Catron served in the War of 1812 under Andrew Jackson. Following the war, Catron studied law and was admitted to the bar in Tennessee in 1815. The same year, he began a private practice in Sparta, Tennessee, while also serving as the prosecuting attorney for the city. In 1818 Catron moved to Nashville, where he established a land law practice.

Early Career

In 1824 Catron was appointed to the Tennessee Supreme Court of Errors and Appeals. Seven years later in 1831 he was elevated to Chief Justice of that court, where he served for another three years. After the position of Chief Justice was abolished, Catron moved back to Nashville to resume his private practice.

During the Presidential Election of 1836 Catron led Martin Van Buren’s campaign throughout the state of Tennessee. In doing so, Catron gained renowned for his support of Jacksonian Democracy.

Supreme Court

In 1836, Congress expanded the number of positions on the United States Supreme Court from seven to nine members. Just before leaving office, President Andrew Jackson appointed Catron to fill a newly established seat on the Court. John Catron officially began his post on March 8, 1837.

During his tenure on the Supreme Court, Justice Catron became known for his support of slavery. In the landmark Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) hearing, Catron wrote a separate opinion supporting the majority opinion that the slave, Scott, remained a slave despite being taken into a free territory. He concurred with the majority that Congress had no power to interfere with slavery in the western territories.

Although Justice Catron served on the Supreme Court for nearly three decades, he made very few court decisions and generally voted in line with Chief Justice Roger Taney.

In the early 1960’s, Justice Catron voiced his opposition against succession, despite its support from his home state of Tennessee. In doing so, Catron was forced to relocate to Kentucky during the Civil War when he refused to support the confederacy.

Death

Justice Catron served on the Supreme Court until his death on May 30, 1865 at the age of 79.

Notable Cases:

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising