Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Joseph McKenna

 

Joseph McKenna (1898-1925)

Lived from 1843 to 1926.

Early Life and Legal Career

Joseph McKenna was born on August 10, 1843 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to Irish Catholic Immigrants. Growing up, he attended St. Joseph’s College before studying law at the Benicia Collegiate Institute in Benicia, California. After being admitted to the California bar in 1865, McKenna became District Attorney for Solano County. He then campaigned for and won a seat in the California State Assembly, where he spent two years. In 1885, McKenna was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives. He served four terms in the House before being appointed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in 1892 by President Benjamin Harris. Five years later, in 1897, he was appointed the 42nd Attorney General of the United States by President William McKinley. McKenna served in that capacity until 1898.

Appointment to the Supreme Court

McKenna was appointed an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States in 1898 by President William McKinley. After his confirmation, he studied law at Columbia Law School to prepare for the burdens he would face as a justice. While he failed to develop a consistent legal philosophy, McKenna was responsible for authoring several important decisions. One of the most notable came in United States v. U.S. Steel Corporation, which held that antitrust cases would be decided on the “rule of reason” principle–only alleged monopolistic combinations that are in unreasonable restraint of trade are illegal.

McKenna was known to be a centrist, and was one of the most vigorous members of the Supreme Court. During his tenure, McKenna authored 614 majority opinions and 146 dissenting opinions. In January 1925, after his performance began to decline due to a stroke suffered ten-years prior, McKenna was forced to step down from the bench. By the end of his tenure, he was unable to write coherent opinions.

Death

McKenna died on November 21, 1926 in Washington, D.C. at the age of 83. His remains are buried in the city’s Mount Olivet Cemetery.

Notable Cases

Hipolite Egg Co. v. United States (1911)

United States v. U.S. Steel Corporation (1920)

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising