Federal Judge John Pickering Remebered For His Impeachment
John Pickering served as chief justice of the New Hampshire Superior Court of Judicature and as a judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. However, he is most remembered as the first federal officer to be impeached.
Early Career of John Pickering
Pickering was born on September 22, 1737, in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Upon graduating Harvard University, he began a private law practice. Pickering entered public service in 1983 and served as a member of the New Hampshire House of Representatives until 1787. While Pickering was nominated to represent New Hampshire at the Constitutional Convention, he elected to continue practicing law. In 1790, Pickering was appointed to the New Hampshire Superior Court and ultimately became its Chief Justice.
On February 10, 1795, President George Washington nominated Pickering to preside on the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire He was confirmed by the U.S. Senate and assumed the office two months later. After five years on the bench, Pickering began to show signs of cognitive decline. In 1801, Judge Jeremiah Smith was asked to fulfill Pickering’s duties.
Impeachment of John Pickering
After years of poor health, Pickering had developed a reputation for “ravings, cursings, and crazed incoherences.” As part of his effort to remove Federalist judges from office, President Thomas Jefferson suggested that Pickering’s embarrassing conduct and alleged unlawful rulings amounted to an impeachable offense. Because Pickering refused to resign, Jefferson argued that impeachment was the only way to remove him from the bench.
Pickering was charged with mental instability and intoxication on the bench and impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives on March 2, 1803. The articles of impeachment stated, in part:
That whereas for the due, faithful, and impartial administration of justice, temperance and sobriety are essential qualities in the character of a judge, yet the said John Pickering, being a man of loose morals and intemperate habits, on the 11th and 12th days of November, in the year 1802, being then judge of the district court in and for the district of New Hampshire, did appear on the bench of the said court for the administration of justice in a state of total intoxication, produced by the free and intemperate use of intoxicating liquors…
Pickering was convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office on March 12, 1804. Pickering’s impeachment was controversial, in large part because the Constitution defines impeachable offenses as “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” While Pickering may have been unfit to serve as a federal judge, he had not committed any crime. Critics argued that if Pickering could be removed from federal office for his bizarre behavior, Congress could rely on impeachment to remove others for political reasons.
For more information on Federal Impeachments, please visit the Impeachment of Federal Judges in our interactive Constitution section.
For a list of all Federal Judges that have been impeached please visit our Impeachment of Federal Judges page.
Massachusetts v. EPA Sets the Standard for Climate Lawsuitsby DONALD SCARINCI on February 11, 2020
With climate change lawsuits on the rise, environmentalists are concerned that the conservative-lea...
Faithless Electors Up for Grabsby DONALD SCARINCI on February 5, 2020
The United States Supreme Court will hear Chiafalo v. Washington, to decide whether members of the ...
Ray v. Blair First Addressed Faithless Electorsby DONALD SCARINCI on February 4, 2020
In Ray v. Blair, 343 U.S. 214 (1952), the U.S. Supreme Court first considered the notion of “fait...
- Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
- Freedom of Speech
- Freedoms of Press
- Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
- The Right to Bear Arms
- Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
- Due Process
- Eminent Domain
- Rights of Criminal Defendants
Preamble to the Bill of Rights
Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.
THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.