Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Antonin Scalia

Antonin Scalia was an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court and at the time of his death was serving as Senior Associate Justice.

Early Life

Antonin Scalia was born on March 11, 1936 in Trenton, New Jersey. Scalia received his undergraduate degree in 1957 from Georgetown University, where he graduated as valedictorian, and later earned his juris doctor at Harvard Law School. He worked at a Cleveland law firm for six years before leaving the practice in 1967 to teach law at the University of Virginia.

Career

Starting in 1971, Scalia served several public service roles under two presidential administrations. President Richard Nixon appointed Scalia to serve as general counsel for the Office of Telecommunications Policy, and between 1972 and 1974, he was chairman of Administrative Conference of the United States. In 1974, he was nominated as Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, a position he was renominated for by President Gerald Ford following Nixon’s resignation. Scalia left public office following Ford’s defeat, and taught at the University of Chicago Law School between 1977 and 1982.

In 1982, President Ronald Reagan nominated Scalia to sit on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Supreme Court Justice

William Rehnquist‘s nomination to Chief Justice opened a vacancy in the high court and President Reagan nominated Scalia to serve as a Justice in 1986. Scalia was known for his strict stances on textualism and originalism. Scalia was a strong advocate of clearly separating powers between the government branches and his earliest court rulings reflect this belief. In cases between the federal government and states, Scalia typically upheld states’ rights. In cases involving individual rights, Scalia was renowned for striking down potential laws that would create distinctions on the basis of race, gender and sexual orientation. He strongly dissented from majority opinions upholding affirmative action. Further, Scalia was known for taking a hard stance against criminal defendants, and advocated for striking down Miranda v. Arizona and upholding the constitutionality of the death penalty. Scalia had a reputation for being inquisitive and making more comments than some of his other legal counterparts.

Death

Justice Scalia died of natural causes on February 13, 2016 in Shafter, Texas while on a quail hunting trip. His death opened up a vacancy in the Supreme Court that has yet to be filled.

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising