Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

May 6, 2025 | SCOTUS Rules Non-Citizens Must Challenge Removal Under Alien Enemies Act

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

Horace Gray

Horace Gray (1882-1902)

Horace Gray lived from 1828 to 1902.

Early Life and Legal Career

Gray was born in Boston, Massachusetts on March 24, 1828 to one of Boston’s most elite merchant families. His father, William Gray, was at one time considered the richest man in New England. Gray enrolled at Harvard College at the age of 13, graduating just four years later. Following graduation, he began studying law at Harvard but never received a degree. Nonetheless, Gray was admitted to the bar in 1851.

In 1854, Gray was named Reporter of Decisions for the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Although he was young, Gray excelled in the position, earning a respectable reputation as a scholar and legal historian. Ten years later, at the age of 36, Gray was appointed to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court as an Associate Justice, making him the youngest appointee in the court’s history. In 1873, Gray became Chief Justice of the Court, a position he held until his appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Appointment to the Supreme Court

In 1881, Gray was nominated to the Supreme Court to serve as an Associate Justice by President Chester A. Arthur. Gray was one of few Supreme Court appointees in the latter half of the 19th century who had not previously served as politicians; he maintained the opinion that law and politics were entirely separate fields.

Gray is well known for his opinion in Mutual Life Insurance Co. of N.Y. v. Hillmon, in which he held that a declarant’s out-of-court statement of his intention to do something or go somewhere in the future is admissible under the “state-of-mind” hearsay exception. Gray also penned the opinion in the case United States v. Wong Kim Ark.  In Wong Kim Ark, the court ruled that “a child born in the United States to parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States.” In the infamous case of Plessy v. Ferguson, which upheld racial segregation, Gray also sided with the majority.

Notably, Gray became the first Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court to hire a law clerk. He paid the clerk with his own funds, as government money was not appropriated for this purpose at he time.

Death and Legacy

In 1902, after falling gravely ill, Gray was forced to resign from the Supreme Court. He died later that same year.

Notable Cases

Plessy v. Ferguson

United States v. Wong Kim Ark

Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Hillmon

Previous Articles

Causing Physical Harm Always Involves “Use of Force”
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 29, 2025

In Delligatti v. United States, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the knowing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Confirms Right to Renew Lawsuit Ater Voluntary Dismissal
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 22, 2025

In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court held ...

Read More
Supreme Court Rules Trademark Infringement Damages Include Only Named Defendant’s Profits
by DONALD SCARINCI on April 14, 2025

In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc., 604 U.S. __ (2025), the U.S. SupremeCourt held...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law
  • SCOTUS Rules Challenged South Carolina District Is Not a Racial Gerrymander
  • Supreme Court Rejects Strict Criminal Forfeiture Timelines
  • Supreme Court Clarifies “Safety Valve” in Federal Criminal Sentencing Laws

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards

Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising