Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
    • First Ladies
    • Signers of the U.S. Constitution
    • Signers of the Declaration of Independence
    • Delegates of the U.S. Constitution
    • Misc – Great American Bios
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

August 21, 2025 | SCOTUS Allows Termination of Dept of Education Employees

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
<< Back

George Shiras, Jr.

George Shiras, Jr. (1892-1903)

George Shiras, Jr. lived from 1832 to 1924.

Early Life and Legal Career

Shiras was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on January 26, 1832. He attended Ohio University and Yale College, graduating from Yale in 1853. Shiras then enrolled in Yale Law School, but left before earning his law degree. He instead completed his legal training by reading law at a law office. Shiras began practicing law in Dubuque, Iowa, before moving his practice to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In Pittsburgh, Shiras represented large industrial clients and became a prominent corporate attorney.

Appointment to the Supreme Court

On July 19, 1892, Shiras was nominated to the Supreme Court of the United States by President Benjamin Harrison. Although he had nearly forty years of legal experience at that time, Shiras had very little public service experience.

Shiras’ method of interpretation on the bench depended heavily on precedent and conventional rules. During his ten-year tenure, he authored 253 majority decisions and 14 dissenting opinions. However, Shiras is noted for his votes on just two landmark cases: Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. and Plessy v. Ferguson. In both cases, he sided with the majority. In Pollock, Shiras voted to strike down the Income Tax Act of 1894, believing it to be unconstitutional. This ruling led to the need for a constitutional amendment to impose a federal income tax, and in 1913, the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified. In Plessy v. Ferguson, the Court upheld racial segregation under “separate but equal.” That decision, however, was overruled in 1954. Shiras retired from the bench on February 23, 1903 at the age of 70.

Death

Shiras remained in retirement until his death in Pittsburgh in 1924.

Notable Cases

Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. (1895)

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Previous Articles

Divided Court Allows President to Fire Agency Officials
by DONALD SCARINCI on August 21, 2025

In Trump v. Wilcox, 605 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court granted the Trump Administration...

Read More
SCOTUS Grants Death Row Inmate New Trial in Glossip v. Oklahoma
by DONALD SCARINCI on

In Glossip v. Oklahoma, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court granted death row inmate Richa...

Read More
SCOTUS Allows Termination of Dept of Education Employees
by DONALD SCARINCI on

In McMahon v. New York, 606 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to stay a district cour...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Pauses Order Reinstating CPSC Commissioners
  • Divided Court Allows President to Fire Agency Officials
  • SCOTUS Grants Death Row Inmate New Trial in Glossip v. Oklahoma
  • SCOTUS Clarifies Bruen in Upholding Federal Gun Law

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising