Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
    • First Ladies
    • Signers of the U.S. Constitution
    • Signers of the Declaration of Independence
    • Delegates of the U.S. Constitution
    • Misc – Great American Bios
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

August 10, 2026 | Supreme Court Strikes Down Limits on Coordinated Political Party Spending

Tag: trademark law

Scotus Limits Foreign Reach of Trademark Law

SCOTUS Limits Foreign Reach of Trademark Law

In Abitron Austria GmbH v. Hetronic Int’l, Inc., 600 U.S. ____ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the trademark infringement provisions of the Lanham Act do not apply extraterritorially, but rather extend only to claims where the infringing ...

Read More
SCOTUS Sides With Jack Daniels in Dog Toy Trademark Dispute

SCOTUS Sides With Jack Daniels in Dog Toy Trademark Dispute

In Jack Daniel’s Properties v. VIP Products LLC, 599 U.S. ____ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously found that when an alleged trademark infringer uses the mark as a designation of source for its own goods or services the threshold test for ...

Read More
Supreme Court to Consider Jack Daniels Trademark Case

Supreme Court to Consider Jack Daniels Trademark Case

The U.S. Supreme Court recently added to its growing list of high-profile intellectual property cases, agreeing to consider Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC. The trademark case involves a dog toy, “Bad Spaniels,” that imitate...

Read More
SCOTUS to Consider Ban on Disparaging Trademarks in Lee v Tam

SCOTUS to Consider Ban on Disparaging Trademarks in Lee v Tam

On September 29, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court added nine cases to its docket. Lee v Tam, which challenges the federal ban on disparaging trademarks, has the potential to be a blockbuster. The Court’s decision could also have serious implications fo...

Read More
Week in Review & OBB Personenverkehr AG v. Sachs

Week in Review & OBB Personenverkehr AG v. Sachs

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its first decision of the term. In OBB Personenverkehr AG v. Sachs, (2015), the Court unanimously held that the doctrine of sovereign immunity barred a California woman’s lawsuit against the Austrian nationa...

Read More

Previous Articles

Supreme Court Reaffirms Birthright Citizenship, Striking Down Executive Order
by DONALD SCARINCI on August 4, 2026
Supreme Court Reaffirms Birthright Citizenship, Striking Down Executive Order

In Trump v. Barbara, 609 U.S. ___ (2026), the U.S. Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump...

Read More
Supreme Court Holds FTC’s For-Cause Removal Protections Violate the Constitution
by DONALD SCARINCI on July 27, 2026
Supreme Court Holds FTC’s For-Cause Removal Protections Violate the Constitution

In Trump v. Slaughter, 609 U.S. ___ (2026), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Federal Trade Comm...

Read More
Divided SCOTUS Sides With Fed Governor in Removal Dispute
by DONALD SCARINCI on July 20, 2026
Divided SCOTUS Sides With Fed Governor in Removal Dispute

In Trump v. Cook, 609 U.S. ___ (2026), a divided Court denied the Government’s application to sta...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of First Step Act to Vacated Sentences
  • SCOTUS Rules E-Cigarette Retailers Can Challenge FDA Order in Fifth Circuit
  • Supreme Court Expands Judicial Review of Agency Actions
  • Supreme Court Pauses Order Reinstating CPSC Commissioners

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising