Menu
July 27, 2026 | Supreme Court Holds FTC’s For-Cause Removal Protections Violate the Constitution

In Trump v. Slaughter, 609 U.S. ___ (2026), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Federal Trade Commission’s (FCC) for-cause removal provision violates the separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution. In so ruling, the majority expressly ove...

In Trump v. Cook, 609 U.S. ___ (2026), a divided Court denied the Government’s application to stay the district court’s order preliminarily enjoining the purported firing of Federal Reserve System Governor Lisa Cook pending the conclusion of lit...

In Wolford v. Lopez, 609 U.S. ___ (2026), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Hawaii’s law prohibiting licensed concealed-carry permit holders from carrying handguns on private property open to the public without the property owner’s express author...

In United States v. Hemani, 608 U.S. ___ (2026), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that the federal government's prosecution of a nonviolent marijuana user for possessing a gun violated the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms. Facts o...

In Trump v. Cook, 609 U.S. ___ (2026), a divided Court denied the Government’s application to sta...

In Wolford v. Lopez, 609 U.S. ___ (2026), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Hawaii’s law prohibiti...

In United States v. Hemani, 608 U.S. ___ (2026), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that the...
Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.
THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

