Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
    • First Ladies
    • Signers of the U.S. Constitution
    • Signers of the Declaration of Independence
    • Delegates of the U.S. Constitution
    • Misc – Great American Bios
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

August 17, 2026 | SCOTUS Rules States Can Ban Transgender Athletes from Female Sports

Tag: U.S. Supreme Court

Luis v. United States: Frozen Assets and the Sixth Amendment

Luis v. United States: Frozen Assets and the Sixth Amendment

In Luis v. United States, 136 U.S. 1083 (2016), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the pretrial freeze of a criminal defendant's legitimate, untainted assets violates the Sixth Amendment right to counsel of choice. While the significant constitutiona...

Read More
Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company: ERISA Pre-empts State Health Care Database

Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company: ERISA Pre-empts State Health Care Database

On March 1, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) pre-empts a Vermont law requiring certain entities, including health insurers, to report payments relating to health care claims to a state agency ...

Read More
Historical In re Eugene v. Debs: The Commerce Clause & Labor Strike Injunction

In re Eugene v. Debs: The Commerce Clause & Labor Strike Injunction

In In re Eugene V. Debs, 158 U.S. 564 (1895), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the government’s use of a court injunction to order striking workers back on the job. In a unanimous decision, the Court held that the federal government had the right ...

Read More
United States v. Texas Addresses Presidential Use of Executive Orders

United States v. Texas Addresses Presidential Use of Executive Orders

In January, the U.S. Supreme Court added another potential blockbuster case to the current Term. In United States v. Texas, the justices will consider whether President Obama’s use of executive action to further his immigration policy violated the ...

Read More
Portrait of Justice James Francis Byrnes

Davis v. Ayala: Excluding Attorneys from Batson Hearing Was Harmless Error

In Davis v. Ayala, 135 S. Ct. 2187 (2015), the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether it was a harmless error to exclude defense counsel from the Batson hearing. A deeply divided court ultimately answered yes, highlighting that habeas petitioners are ...

Read More
Week in Review: SCOTUS Chides California Court & Adds Drunk Driving Case

Week in Review: SCOTUS Chides California Court & Adds Drunk Driving Case

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia, holding that the California Court of Appeal erred in finding an arbitration clause required the application of state law despite its preemption by the Federal Arbitrat...

Read More
T-Mobile South LLC v. City of Roswell: Municipal Denials of Cell Tower Requests

T-Mobile South LLC v. City of Roswell: Municipal Denials of Cell Tower Requests

In T-Mobile South LLC v. City of Roswell, 135 S.Ct. 808 (2015), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the federal Telecommunications Act mandates that municipalities provide a written explanation when denying a cell tower application. Moreover, the explan...

Read More
U.S. Supreme Court Review For October, 2015

U.S. Supreme Court Review For October, 2015

U.S. Supreme Court Review for October, 2015: The justices of the Court have been busy since returning to the bench. The Supreme Court Review covers oral arguments in ten cases and added a number of important new cases to the docket. On Oc...

Read More
Securities Act of 1933: In Omnicare v. Laborers Dist. Council

Securities Act of 1933: In Omnicare v. Laborers Dist. Council

In Omnicare v. Laborers Dist. Council, 135 S. Ct. 1318 (2015), the U.S. Supreme Court interpreted section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, which addresses the liability for statements of opinion that had divided the Federal Courts of appeal....

Read More
Historical West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette

West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette

In West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943), the U.S. Supreme Court held that requiring public school children to salute the American flag and recite the pledge of allegiance violates the First Amendment. The 6-3 decision was fit...

Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19

Previous Articles

Supreme Court Strikes Down Limits on Coordinated Political Party Spending
by DONALD SCARINCI on August 10, 2026
Supreme Court Strikes Down Limits on Coordinated Political Party Spending

In National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, 609 U.S. ____ (2026), t...

Read More
Supreme Court Reaffirms Birthright Citizenship, Striking Down Executive Order
by DONALD SCARINCI on August 4, 2026
Supreme Court Reaffirms Birthright Citizenship, Striking Down Executive Order

In Trump v. Barbara, 609 U.S. ___ (2026), the U.S. Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump...

Read More
Supreme Court Holds FTC’s For-Cause Removal Protections Violate the Constitution
by DONALD SCARINCI on July 27, 2026
Supreme Court Holds FTC’s For-Cause Removal Protections Violate the Constitution

In Trump v. Slaughter, 609 U.S. ___ (2026), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Federal Trade Comm...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of First Step Act to Vacated Sentences
  • SCOTUS Rules E-Cigarette Retailers Can Challenge FDA Order in Fifth Circuit
  • Supreme Court Expands Judicial Review of Agency Actions
  • Supreme Court Pauses Order Reinstating CPSC Commissioners

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising