Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
    • First Ladies
    • Signers of the U.S. Constitution
    • Signers of the Declaration of Independence
    • Delegates of the U.S. Constitution
    • Misc – Great American Bios
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

August 17, 2026 | SCOTUS Rules States Can Ban Transgender Athletes from Female Sports

Tag: U.S. Supreme Court

Pena-Rodriguez v Colorado Racial Bias

Racial Bias Trumps Juror Secrecy in Pena-Rodriguez v Colorado

A divided U.S. Supreme Court recently held that while jury deliberations should normally be kept secret, racial or ethnic bias mandates an exception to the rule. The court decided Pena-Rodriguez v Colorado, 580 U. S. ____ (2017) by a vote of 5-3. Fa...

Read More
Gloucester County School Board v GG Case Remanded Back to Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Gloucester County School Board v GG Transgender Case Returned to Lower Court

The U.S. Supreme Court will not decide the potential blockbuster transgender bathroom case anytime soon. The justices recently remanded Gloucester County School Board v GG back to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.   Facts of Gloucester C...

Read More
Bethune-Hill v Virginia State Board of Elections

Bethune-Hill v Virginia State Board of Elections: Redistricting & Racial Gerrymandering in Virginia

In Bethune-Hill v Virginia State Board of Elections, the U.S. Supreme Court considered what constitutes racial gerrymandering.   Through its holding that the district court applied an incorrect legal standard in determining that race did ...

Read More
Buck v Davis Case

Buck v Davis: Racial Bias & Sixth Amendment Might Reverse Death Sentence

In Buck v Davis, 580 U. S. ____ (2017), the U.S. Supreme Court recently held that a death row inmate was likely prejudiced by expert witness testimony offered by his own defense team that suggested he was more likely to be dangerous in the future bec...

Read More
District of Columbia v Wesby

District of Columbia v Wesby: SCOTUS Adds Fourth Amendment Case to Docket

The U.S. Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in District of Columbia v Wesby. The case, which sprung from a wild D.C. party, addresses two important criminal law issues. The first is when the Fourth Amendment probable cause standard allows poli...

Read More
Court Sides with Former VA Governor in McDonnell v United States

Court Sides with Former VA Governor in McDonnell v United States

In McDonnell v United States, 579 U. S. ____ (2016), the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the conviction of the former governor of Virginia, Bob McDonnell. In a unanimous decision, the justices rejected federal prosecutors’ broad interpretation of the te...

Read More
Puerto Rico v Valle: Court Denies Territory’s Sovereignty in Double Jeopardy Case

Puerto Rico v Valle: Court Denies Territory’s Sovereignty in Double Jeopardy Case

In Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v Sanchez Valle 579 U.S ___ (2016), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the federal government are not separate sovereigns for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States...

Read More
Army Corps of Engineers v Hawkes Co and Final Agency Actions

Army Corps of Engineers v Hawkes Co and Final Agency Actions

In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court in Army Corps of Engineers v Hawkes Co 578 U.S._____(2016) addressed whether a “jurisdictional determination” (JD) that wetlands are subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act was a final agen...

Read More
selective service act

Selective Draft Law Cases Hold Conscription Is Constitutional

In Arver v. United States, 245 U.S. 366 (1918), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Congress was authorized under the Constitution to compel military service pursuant to the Selective Service Act of 1917. The consolidated cases are also known as the...

Read More
HistoricalStandard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States

Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States

In Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Standard Oil Company was guilty of operating a monopoly in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. While the Court upheld the app...

Read More
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19

Previous Articles

Supreme Court Strikes Down Limits on Coordinated Political Party Spending
by DONALD SCARINCI on August 10, 2026
Supreme Court Strikes Down Limits on Coordinated Political Party Spending

In National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, 609 U.S. ____ (2026), t...

Read More
Supreme Court Reaffirms Birthright Citizenship, Striking Down Executive Order
by DONALD SCARINCI on August 4, 2026
Supreme Court Reaffirms Birthright Citizenship, Striking Down Executive Order

In Trump v. Barbara, 609 U.S. ___ (2026), the U.S. Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump...

Read More
Supreme Court Holds FTC’s For-Cause Removal Protections Violate the Constitution
by DONALD SCARINCI on July 27, 2026
Supreme Court Holds FTC’s For-Cause Removal Protections Violate the Constitution

In Trump v. Slaughter, 609 U.S. ___ (2026), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Federal Trade Comm...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of First Step Act to Vacated Sentences
  • SCOTUS Rules E-Cigarette Retailers Can Challenge FDA Order in Fifth Circuit
  • Supreme Court Expands Judicial Review of Agency Actions
  • Supreme Court Pauses Order Reinstating CPSC Commissioners

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising