Constitutional Law Reporter
Award
Menu
  • Home
  • US Constitution
  • Supreme Court Cases
  • Justices
    • Chief Supreme Court Justices
    • Current Supreme Court Justices
    • Past US Supreme Court Justices
  • American Biographies
    • General
    • Presidents
    • Vice-Presidents
    • First Ladies
    • Signers of the U.S. Constitution
    • Signers of the Declaration of Independence
    • Delegates of the U.S. Constitution
    • Misc – Great American Bios
  • Articles
    • Current Cases
    • Historical Cases
    • Impeachment
  • Videos
  • Links
Hot-Topics

October 23, 2025 | Supreme Court Cases to Watch in the October Sitting

Category: Supreme Court Decisions

Murr v Wisconsin Supreme Court Creates New Regulatory Takings Test

Murr v Wisconsin Supreme Court Creates New Regulatory Takings Test

In Murr v Wisconsin, 582 U. S. ____ (2017), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Wisconsin Supreme Court's ruling that two contiguous lots should be considered one parcel for the purposes of the government taking a case. In so ruling, the Court establi...

Read More
Denying Grant to Church School Violates Free Exercise Clause

Denying Grant to Church School Violates Free Exercise Clause

In Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Carol S. Comer, Director, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, 582 U. S. ____ (2017), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the State of Missouri violated the U.S. Constitution’s Free Exercise Clause ...

Read More
Dean v United States Preserves Flexibility in Mandatory Minimum Sentences

Dean v United States Preserves Flexibility in Mandatory Minimum Sentences

In Dean v United States, 581 U. S. ____ (2017), the U.S. Supreme Court held that district courts have the discretion to determine whether a defendant has already been given a mandatory sentence for one crime when considering an appropriate sentence ...

Read More
Pretrial Detention

Pretrial Detention Fits Fourth Amendment “as Hand in Glove”

In Manuel v. City of Joliet, 580 U. S. ____ (2017), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a Fourth Amendment malicious prosecution claim is the proper avenue for challenging an unlawful post-arrest detention. According to the seven-member majority, such a...

Read More
McLane v. EEOC - Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

McLane v. EEOC Subpoenas Should Be Reviewed for Abuse of Discretion

In McLane v. EEOC, 581 U. S. ____ (2017), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a district court’s decision whether to enforce or quash a subpoena issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) should be reviewed for abuse of discretion ra...

Read More
National Labor Relations Board v SW General

Article 2 “Advice and Consent” Limits Appointment Power of the President

In National Labor Relations Board v. SW General, the Supreme Court limited the President’s ability to fill vacancies under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 (FVRA). By a vote of 7-2, the Court held that a person can’t serve in an acting ca...

Read More
Beckles v United States 2017

Beckles v United States Upholds Constitutionality of Federal Sentencing Guidelines

In Beckles v United States, 580 U. S. ____ (2017), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the country’s federal sentencing guidelines. By a vote of 7-0, the Court held that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, including Section 4B1.2...

Read More
Pena-Rodriguez v Colorado Racial Bias

Racial Bias Trumps Juror Secrecy in Pena-Rodriguez v Colorado

A divided U.S. Supreme Court recently held that while jury deliberations should normally be kept secret, racial or ethnic bias mandates an exception to the rule. The court decided Pena-Rodriguez v Colorado, 580 U. S. ____ (2017) by a vote of 5-3. Fa...

Read More
Bethune-Hill v Virginia State Board of Elections

Bethune-Hill v Virginia State Board of Elections: Redistricting & Racial Gerrymandering in Virginia

In Bethune-Hill v Virginia State Board of Elections, the U.S. Supreme Court considered what constitutes racial gerrymandering.   Through its holding that the district court applied an incorrect legal standard in determining that race did ...

Read More
Fry v Napoleon Community Schools

Fry v Napoleon Community Schools Defines Difference between Disability and Education Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court recently released its decision in Fry v Napoleon Community Schools. The justices unanimously held that exhaustion of the administrative procedures established by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is unneces...

Read More
  1. 1
  2. ...
  3. 9
  4. 10
  5. 11
  6. 12
  7. 13
  8. 14
  9. 15
  10. 16
  11. 17
  12. 18
  13. 19
  14. 20
  15. 21
  16. 22
  17. 23
  18. 24
  19. 25
  20. 26
  21. 27
  22. 28
  23. 29
  24. ...
  25. 43

Previous Articles

SCOTUS Clears Way for Termination of FTC Commissioner
by DONALD SCARINCI on October 17, 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court’s emergency order in Trump v. Slaughter, 606 U.S. ____ (2025), allows Pres...

Read More
U.S. Supreme Court Adds Tariff Case to Docket
by DONALD SCARINCI on October 15, 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider two lawsuits challenging President Donald Trump’s n...

Read More
Supreme Court Stays Order Blocking Roving Immigration Patrols in CA
by DONALD SCARINCI on October 8, 2025

In Noem v. Perdomo, 606 U.S. ____ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court granted an emergency application f...

Read More
All Posts

The Amendments

  • Amendment1
    • Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Freedoms of Press
    • Freedom of Assembly, and Petitition
    Read More
  • Amendment2
    • The Right to Bear Arms
    Read More
  • Amendment4
    • Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
    Read More
  • Amendment5
    • Due Process
    • Eminent Domain
    • Rights of Criminal Defendants
    Read More

Preamble to the Bill of Rights

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

Read More

More Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of First Step Act to Vacated Sentences
  • SCOTUS Rules E-Cigarette Retailers Can Challenge FDA Order in Fifth Circuit
  • Supreme Court Expands Judicial Review of Agency Actions
  • Supreme Court Pauses Order Reinstating CPSC Commissioners

Constitutional Law Reporter Twitter

A Twitter List by S_H_Law

Constitutional Law Reporter RSS

donald scarinci constitutional law attorney

Editor

Donald Scarinci

Managing Partner

Scarinci Hollenbeck

(201) 806-3364

Awards


Follow me

© 2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising